Monthly Archives: December 2023

As the world becomes mired in materialism, fake ScienceTM, AI, and transhumanism, we lose the connection to Spirit, to our own divinity, which provides the fundamental optimism and creativity that motivates a prosperous society. Embracing materialism, we lose the human connection that recognizes and respects each other and leads to tolerance and respect for the diversity of thought and belief that is the bedrock of successful human interaction. As a result we get a society awash in drugs, violence, and hatred.

The lack of a spiritual connection in our daily lives leads instead to self-criticism, dehumanization, and even the refusal to protect our culture.

There will never be peace in a world without spirituality or religion. I am not religious myself but I follow this simple little dictum: “Blessed is the human being who finds God any way they can.”

There will never be peace in a world without a fundamental belief in the divinity of the human spirit.

This Christmas, whether you are religious or not, let us ponder what kind of a world we want to live in, and then begin to create that world in our daily lives.

Blessings to all this Christmas!

The Net Zero carbon emissions agenda has little to do with climate or the environment

When Climate Change is discussed, two things are accepted as a given:

1. Global Warming.

2. CO2 emissions from industry are responsible for the global warming.

But there is a much more modern form of climate change: environmental modification, or ENMOD, which is the artificial, man-made creation of tsunamis, earthquakes, and hurricanes that can cause vast environmental destruction.  

Prof. Michel Chossudovsky has republished an informative article about ENMOD. This  article is well worth reading because it suggests that since the mid-1990s, some of the destructive environmental events may not be due to “climate change,” but induced by destructive, man-made, environmental weather warfare.

On Maui in the summer of 2023, vast fires burned the entire town of Lahaina. Researchers on Maui have suggested that Directed Energy Weapons were used to start those fires.

Modern weaponry and technology, not just carbon emissions, can influence climate events.

Here is a brief summary of the high points of the article:

1. The 2023 United Nations Climate Change Conference or COP28 Conference was held from November 30 to December 12, 2023. Not a single word pertaining to Environmental Modification Techniques (ENMOD) was mentioned in any of the papers or lectures presented to the conference.

2. “The so-called ‘climate emergency’ is to be resolved by a ‘Race to Zero’ which consists in drastically reducing greenhouse gas emissions.”

3. “As in previous climate summits, environmental modification techniques (ENMOD) –which can trigger tsunamis, typhoons and earthquakes – have been casually dismissed by COP28. The emphasis is on CO2 and the dangers of global warming.” 

4. ENMOD weather modifying platforms have been fully operational since 1995.

It all began with John von Neumann, instrumental in the invention of the computer, back in 1955. Von Neumann wrote:

 “Intervention in atmospheric and climatic matters ….will unfold on a scale difficult to imagine at present… [T]his will merge each nation’s affairs with those of every other, more thoroughly than the threat of a nuclear or any other war would have done.”

— Quoted in Spencer Weart, Environmental Warfare: Climate Modification Schemes, Global Research, December 5, 2009

Then, in 1977, the UN General Assembly prohibited “military or other hostile use of environmental modification techniques having widespread, long-lasting or severe effects.”

— AP, 18 May 1977.

From the ENMOD article:

The Convention defined ‘environmental modification techniques’ as referring to any technique for changing–through the deliberate manipulation of natural processes–the dynamics, composition or structure of the earth, including its biota, lithosphere, hydrosphere and atmosphere or of outer space.”

— Environmental Modification Ban Faithfully Observed, States Parties Declare, UN Chronicle, July, 1984, Vol. 21, p. 27

The substance of the 1977 Convention was reasserted in very general terms in the Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) signed at the 1992 Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro.


Following the 1992 Earth Summit, the issue of Climate Change for military use was never raised in subsequent climate change summits and venues under the auspices of the UNFCCC. The issue was erased, forgotten. It is not part of the debate on climate change.

In 2007, The Daily Express reported – following the release and declassification of British government papers from the National Archives – that:

The [declassified] documents reveal that both the US, which led the field, and the Soviet Union had secret military programmes with the goal of controlling the world’s climate. ‘By the year 2025 the United States will own the weather,’ one scientist is said to have boasted.

These claims are dismissed by sceptics as wild conspiracy theories and the stuff of James Bond movies but there is growing evidence that the boundaries between science fiction and fact are becoming increasingly blurred.


The possibility of climatic or environmental manipulations as part of a military agenda, while formally acknowledged by official government documents and the US military, has never been considered relevant to the Climate debate. Military analysts are mute on the subject. Meteorologists are not investigating the matter, and environmentalists are strung on global warming and the Kyoto protocol.”

Then, of course, there is the widely acknowledged HAARP program, which is capable of heating the ionosphere and causing atmospheric phenomena using targeted high-intensity radio wave emissions.  

From an article titled “The Ultimate Weapon of Mass Destruction: ‘Owning the Weather’ for Military Use,” written 19 years ago in 2004:

The US Air Force has the capability of manipulating climate either for testing purposes or for outright military-intelligence use. These capabilities extend to the triggering of floods, hurricanes, droughts and earthquakes. In recent years, large amounts of money have been allocated by the US Department of Defense to further developing and perfecting these capabilities.

Weather modification will become a part of domestic and international security and could be done unilaterally… It could have offensive and defensive applications and even be used for deterrence  purposes. The ability to generate precipitation, fog, and storms on earth or to modify space weather, … and the production of artificial weather all are a part of an integrated set of technologies which can provide substantial increase in US, or degraded capability in an adversary, to achieve global awareness, reach, and power."

US Air Force, emphasis added. Air University of the US Air Force, AF 2025 Final Report,  emphasis added)


To conclude, the climate change discussion focuses exclusively on greenhouse gas emissions and CO2 reduction under the Kyoto Protocol. Modern weather modification technology is ignored by governments, the UN, and environmental activist groups. Is this deliberate?

A large body of scientific knowledge on ENMOD exists. Yet the issue of weather warfare has been excluded from the UN agenda on climate change. ENMOD is military technology that is funded by governments. Are state actors waging weather warfare on each other under the cover of climate change?

Very often the Truth is what you are not allowed to discuss.

But of course these suggestions are just more conspiracy theories.

Nothing to see here...move on.

The brilliant social commentator Mathias Desmet explains why our society is divided into two conflicting and angry camps, and what we can do about it

In this blog I have tried to express the idea that until humanity understands that human consciousness is intimately connected to the Creative Source, we will as a species continue to struggle and resolve problems through conflict and war. In a speech to the Romanian Parliament in November, the brilliant social commentator Mathis Desmet outlines the psychology of conflict in the most eloquent and understandable fashion.

Desmet explains how our modern, materialistic (“rational”) and technological society is becoming totalitarian. It begins when a society becomes fragmented as ours has after the pandemic and the lockdowns and the forced vaccinations. People lose contact with one another, sitting at home in their houses and apartments, wearing masks and not talking to each other in person for fear of becoming infected. The fear of viruses and other biological agents causes fear to spread rapidly throughout society, promoted by a mass media and politicians and “scientists” who push narratives (propaganda) designed to manipulate people.

Large groups of people (“liberals, “conservatives,” “Trump lovers,” “Trump haters,” “pro-vaccine,” “anti-vaccine,” etc., in order to escape their enforced loneliness and their fear, form into camps of differing beliefs. But these camps consist of lonely individuals who embrace a narrative in an attempt to dispel the fear and separation they feel, without genuinely connecting to each other.

These social factions are not personally and physically connected to each other but only to the belief system of the group. This does not dispel loneliness. And so large groups of people can be much more easily manipulated by narratives and propaganda, which sets one group of people against another. In this way society becomes rigidly divided and hatred flourishes.

Prof. Desmet expresses this idea so clearly in his speech, which I will quote from here:

These two evolutions, the emergence of an elite that uses propaganda and a lonely population, reinforce each other. The lonely state is exactly the state in which a population is vulnerable [to] propaganda. In this way, a new kind of masses or crowds emerged throughout the last two centuries: the so-called lonely masses.

“People fall prey to mass formation to escape a pervasive feeling of loneliness and disconnectedness, induced by the rationalization of the world and the ensuing industrialization of the world and the excessive use of technology. They merge together in fanatic mass behavior because this seems to free them from their lonely, atomized state.

“And that is exactly the big illusion of mass formation: belonging to a mass doesn’t liberate a human being from its lonely state. Not at all. A mass is a group that is formed, not because individuals connect to each other, but because each individual separately is connected to a collective ideal. The longer a mass formation exists, the more solidarity they feel for the collective and the less solidarity and love they feel for other individuals. That’s exactly why in the end stage of mass formation and totalitarianism, every individual reports every other individual to the collective, or to the state, if they think that other individual is not loyal enough to the state. And in the end, the unthinkable happens, with mothers reporting their children to the state and children their parents.”

This is brilliantly stated. Combine mass formation, propaganda, and a lonely population with a materialist, technocratic elite bent on creating a “smart” society, the ultimate dystopian nightmare is created: technological Collectivism, a brain-dead, materialist society where individuals are so afraid of death that they deny the immortality of their own souls. Such a society must collapse, for it is the precise opposite of the Truth that a human being is not just a collection of atoms, but an incarnated, immortal soul having a temporary physical experience. The denial of human consciousness causes separation and then disassociation, which leads to depression and mass formation, and ultimately, the collapse of civilization.

Desmet proposes a solution that never occurred to me (geniuses have great insight): something he calls the Art of Sincere Speech:

Propaganda induced mass formation is a fake, symptomatic solution for loneliness. And the real solution lies in the Art of Sincere Speech. My next book, which I am writing now, is all about the psychology of Truth. Truth, by definition, from a psychological point of view, is resonating speech, it is speech which connects people, from core to core, from soul to soul, speech that penetrates through the veil of appearances, through the ideal images we hide behind, the imaginary shells we seek refuge in, and reconnects the shivering and disconnected soul of one human being to that of another human being.

“Here we observe something crucial: sincere speech is the real cure for loneliness – it reconnects people. As such, it takes away the root cause of the major symptom of our rationalist culture – mass formation and totalitarianism.....

“...And at the same time, sincere speech also inhibits this symptom in a more straightforward way... At every moment we chose to speak out in a sincere way, no matter where this happens, in a newspaper or a television interview, but equally well in the presence of only one other person at the kitchen table or in the supermarket, we help to cure society from the disease of totalitarianism.

“Each and every one who speaks a sincere word and succeeds in truly connecting as a human being to another human being, in particular a human being with a different opinion, deserves to be mentioned in the books of history, much more than a president or a minister who engages in propaganda and fails to show the courage to speak sincerely.”

In order to practice sincere speech we have to look into our own souls and go beyond the propaganda and the belief systems a propagandized society has infected us with. It takes courage to do this.

Make no mistake: evil exists in this world. We are in a spiritual war for the souls, hearts, and minds of humanity. The technocrats want to reduce the population and create a soulless, neural chipped and vaxxed society of collectivized zombie robots. This goal is clearly psychotic and anti-human, which shows us what we are dealing with.

However, the Light of the human soul (denied by materialists, Transhumanists, and technocrats) is far, far greater and more powerful than the darkness of technocratic fascism, for it connects us with the energy of the Divine, the One Consciousness that created and maintains the universe.  

Mathias Desmet’s speech can be found here:

Within the EUA framework, science is irrelevant to the regulatory process of approving drugs

The brilliant Sasha Latypova has penetrated the legal framework surrounding the FDA’s issuance of experimental medical products onto the public. In this article, she explains how drug companies can issue experimental products and be legally protected from harm regardless whether those injected are harmed or killed. If you read this article carefully, and listen to the video (I will post the link below) it becomes evident that profit is much more important to the federal government regulatory agencies than safety.

Here is an except Sasha found in the United States Code, 21 USC 360bbb-3a: Emergency use of medical products

Text contains those laws in effect on December 2, 2023

From Title 21-FOOD AND DRUGS



Part E-General Provisions Relating to Drugs and Devices

(c) Current good manufacturing practice

(1) In general

The Secretary may, when the circumstances of a domestic, military, or public health emergency or material threat described in subsection (a)(1)(C) so warrant, authorize, with respect to an eligible product, deviations from current good manufacturing practice requirements otherwise applicable to the manufacture, processing, packing, or holding of products subject to regulation under this chapter, including requirements under section 351 or 360j(f)(1) of this title or applicable conditions prescribed with respect to the eligible product by an order under section 360j(f)(2) of this title.

(2) Effect

Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter or the Public Health Service Act [42 U.S.C. 201 et seq.], an eligible product shall not be considered an unapproved product (as defined in section 360bbb–3(a)(2)(A) of this title) and shall not be deemed adulterated or misbranded under this chapter because, with respect to such product, the Secretary has authorized deviations from current good manufacturing practices under paragraph (1).”

Public Health officials and pharma companies, if they are covered under the PREP act, also receive full immunity from prosecution no matter how many deaths or adverse reactions are experienced by individuals as a result of these medical products.  

How do you like them apples?

Sasha explains in her article how this process works. If you take the time to read it slowly and carefully you will understand how vitally important it is to do your own research before ingesting ANY product released by pharma companies.  

The experimental mRNA vaccines, for example, were issued under Emergency Use Authorization and so do not legally require testing for long-term effects, as was the case before the pandemic.

Here is the complete article, meticulously researched and with explanations and graphs. The above is only a brief explanation.

Here is the video explaining the article.  

Before you begin, here are some definitions:

MCM – Medical Counter Measures. From the CDC website: “”Medical countermeasures (MCMs) are medicines and medical supplies that can be used to diagnose, prevent, or treat diseases related to chemical, biological, radiological, or nuclear (CBRN) threats. MCMs can include Biologic products – vaccines, blood products, and antibodies,

Drugs – antimicrobial or antiviral drugs

Devices – diagnostic tests to identify threat agents and personal protective equipment (PPE)”

IRB – Institutional Review Board. Wikipedia defines IRB as follows: “An institutional review board (IRB), also known as an independent ethics committee (IEC), ethical review board (ERB), or research ethics board (REB), is a committee at an institution that applies research ethics by reviewing the methods proposed for research done at that institution to ensure that the projects are ethical. Such boards are formally designated to approve (or reject), monitor, and review biomedical and behavioral research involving humans...”

BLA – Biologics License Application

EUA – Emergency Use Authorization

There are two legal pathways for a medical product to be distributed: BLA and EUA. BLA is the gold standard where testing, clinical trials, and long term studies are necessary. EUA is also a legal pathway, but it gets around safety and effectiveness testing.