News and Politics

Excerpt from an interview with Dr. Robert Malone, developer of the new mRNA technology used to deliver the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines. (Please read the entire article for a science-based, informative approach to understanding the new technology, or listen to the interview at the link below.)

Mr. Jekielek: Robert, on top of everything else, you’re actually a trained bioethicist. And you’ve already started addressing some of the ethical questions are conundrums around what’s happening or what you see happening. Give me a little bit of the scope of this as we start finishing---

Dr. Malone: I wrote… Thank you for that. And for that lead-in, I personally, I think this is one of the most important topics, is the bioethics of use of an experimental medicine and experimental vaccine.

And the genesis of this whole thought thread was a two-hour conversation with a Canadian physician a number of weeks ago, where he just poured his heart out about what he was seeing with his patients and what was going on in Canada. And I was left saying, “Well, thanks for sharing this, but I can’t help you. I don’t have anything.”

I woke up that Sunday morning with an aha moment. And I said, “I know what I can do for this guy. I can write a piece about bioethics, the bioethics of vaccination under emergency use authorization.”

So, I dug into rich literature that exists as well as federal law. That goes back to The Helsinki Accords, The Belmont report, et cetera, and looked at what are the fundamental principles of bioethics as they relate to use of an experimental product.

1) So point number one just summarize that, and this is, you can find it in The Code of Federal Regulations, it’s referred to as the Common Rule. So this is actually Federal Law. It’s not just words that academicians agree to. So the first thing is that an emergency use authorization product, which is what all these vaccines are, and many of the drugs, is an experimental product. It’s not yet licensed. So that’s point number one. They’re all experimental products.

2) Point number two, if you’re going to be administering experimental products to patients that falls under clinical research, medical research. And so, you have to follow the guidance for medical research. And I mentioned the Common Rule is codified in the Code of Federal Regulations.

a) The first clause, importantly in the Common Rule, is there has to be complete disclosure of risk. You know, intuitively what that means because when you buy a bottle of aspirin, you pull out this little piece of paper, and you look at that, and you go, “Holy Moly, this aspirin is going to kill me.” If you read all the way through, it could cause heart attacks or gastric erosions, or whatever. And you look at that, and you say, “Oh, I don’t know if I want to take that aspirin.”

But the truth is that the ones that are common are up at the top, and we all take aspirin or Tylenol or some version of that. That’s the level of disclosure of adverse event risk that must be provided to patients participating in clinical research. That level of information, as we’ve just been discussing, is censored. It’s not available. So we are not meeting the criteria for full disclosure of risk.

b) Second key principle is that that full disclosure has to be comprehensible and comprehended. Earlier on, I referred to thrombocytopenia, and you were like, “What the heck was that?” And I said, “Low platelets.” That’s a great example. The first one was scientific jargon that was incomprehensible to you. The second one you could understand. So these risks have to be conveyed using language that people can comprehend.

c) Third key principle, you cannot coerce. You cannot entice. The patient or the subject has to freely accept the experimental medicine of their own volition. All these messaging about, “You must take the vaccine. You must take the vaccine because otherwise and aunt Mary could get infected.” All of this messaging that the vaccine is safe, et cetera, all the peer pressure that’s happening around the vaccine, that’s coercion.

Now it gets even more florid with those nations. I don’t think we’ve done it here in the States, but the Canada has. We’re going to give out ice cream cones to get the kiddies to come and take the jab that’s been done. That’s coercion and enticement.

Then there’s the last little codicil in all this. We call it the age of consent. So we here in the States generally agree that the age of consent is 18. If you are at or below the age of consent, you need to have approval or consent from your parent or guardian to take an experimental medicine. They act as your agent because you’re not able to provide consent by definition.

We cannot, by law, have infants, children, and adolescents receiving experimental products without authorization of their parents.

Now, listening to this, [one] might say, “Well, we have this special case of an epidemic, and we have to all get vaccine. Why do we have to all get vaccine? What’s the logic behind that?” What we’re told is we have to all get vaccinated so we will reach herd immunity. That’s the logic.

The problem is that that is a fallacy. We have not gathered the data to even be able to calculate in these clinical trials what would give us herd immunity? What would herd immunity mean? It would mean that we have what’s called sterilizing immunity, or in some way, if we get infected, we don’t spread it to somebody else. That means that we’re not producing virus and shedding virus.

Just today, the World Health Organization made an announcement clear and unequivocal. You’ve got to start using masks because none of these vaccines are preventing infection. They’re preventing disease. They’re not preventing transmission, and they may be reducing transmission, but by how much we don’t know. And so we can’t calculate what the percent uptake is required to reach herd immunity, if we could reach herd immunity with these vaccines.

So there’s an underlying logic that’s been pushed out globally about why we have to take vaccine and how many of us have to take vaccine. And it’s not actually supported by data. And to my mind, that’s a problem. And it’s kind of gone all the way through this outbreak where key public health officials have felt comfortable substituting their opinion for evidence-based medicine.

And that always has to happen at the start of an outbreak because there’s no data. Somebody’s got to have expert opinion. We’re past that point. We have a lot of data, and it’s time we start relying on evidence to make public health decisions, and we’re not doing it.

So to my eye, from the bioethics, we appear to be failing to meet the Code of Federal Regulations, Federal Law, let alone fundamental precepts that go back to the end of World War II. We’re not providing full disclosure of risk. We’re not doing so in a way that’s readily comprehended by the public. And we are enticing, compelling, coercing, and otherwise not respecting the rights of the individual to choose what happens to their body.

And in my mind, that’s bedrock is we all have in Western society, the right to choose the State does not own our body, we do. Particularly for an experimental product.

I argue that we’ve crossed a line. It’s a bioethical line. It may actually be Federal Law that we’ve crossed. Inadvertently, I’m sure for all the best reasons, but if you go back, read the code, read the Nuremberg Code. What we’re doing is not aligned with fundamental principles. And as you know, this happens from time to time during war and crisis.

Cultures decide that it’s okay to bend the rules on some fundamentals of ethics, whether it’s torture, internment of populations, whatever. I believe they almost universally end up regretting it. And so, I’m trying to responsibly ethically with the credibility that I have in my CV, and because of my role in inventing this technology to alert people that I believe that we’re pushing and crossing some key lines here that we really should be respecting.

Mr. Jekielek: Robert, we’re going to have to finish up shortly, but I have probably about a few hours more worth of questions for you at this point. So we’ll have to actually invite you back. Any final thoughts before we finish up for today?

Dr. Malone: Yeah. If I can speak to your audience, like I said, it’s your body. In my recommendation, general recommendation is, in my opinion, these vaccines are saving lives. They’re saving many lives, particularly in the elderly. I get asked the question all the time, “Should I take this vaccine or that vaccine because I have this preexisting condition, an autoimmune disease, or whatever?”

And my recommendation is that you know your body best, you and your medical care provider, and that you have the right to accept or not accept a vaccine product, particularly an experimental one. And that you make your own decision. I can’t advise you, in the end neither can your physician completely advise you.

It’s up to you. It’s your body. It’s your choice. And I just suggest strongly that you take the time to get informed, do the best you can, and then make the decision that you think is right for you."

https://www.theepochtimes.com/dr-robert-malone-mrna-vaccine-inventor-on-the-bioethics-of-experimental-vaccines-and-the-ultimate-gaslighting_3889805.html

In Canada the Trudeau Administration is requiring the vaccination of school children as young as 7 years of age, without parental consent:

Bio-fascism in Canada...coming to the US.

The Biden Administration has already said that it wants to send canvassers to knock on your door and encourage (coerce?) you to get vaccinated. This is a violation of bioethics, point 2c) in the article above.

Biden's HHS chief, Xavier Becerra, said, “It’s absolutely the government’s right to know if you have been vaccinated. We spent trillions trying to keep you healthy of COVID. You don’t have to answer the door but I hope you do.”

Well, the brown stuff is going to hit the fan when the school year begins. How many mothers are going to allow their young children to be vaccinated with an experimental, cell-altering drug? We'll see. A flu vax is one thing, an experimental one is something quite different.

The human race is now engaged in a war of ideas. A cursory examination of this conflict emphasizes debates around COVID-19: lockdowns and the nullification of individual freedoms in the name of public health, or the opening of economies so people can get on with their lives. But the issue is much deeper than that, and literally involves how human societies in the future will be organized. The debate between centralization and decentralization is worldwide, and affects almost every human being on the planet.

In the West, the ideas of the nation state, sovereignty, and territorial integrity began in the 17th century with the signing of  the Peace of Westphalia in 1648, which ended 80 years of war in Europe, and also involved a religious truce of sorts between the three main religions of that time: Roman Catholicism, Lutheranism (based on the doctrines of Martin Luther, which were essentially objections to the perceived corruption in the Catholic Church), and Calvinism. The Peace of Westphalia was the beginning of the modern era of nation states with distinct and protected cultural, religious, and/or political identities. The concept of territorial integrity and national sovereignty were born out of these negotiations almost 400 years ago. These ideas allowed for the establishment of the United Nations in 1945, just after World War II.

The 20th century saw the establishment of communist and fascist states, and a serious  challenge to the Westphalian system across the globe. Of course there have always been totalitarian states throughout human history, but as the population of earth rose from 2 billion in 1927 to 7 billion in 2011, centralization, authoritarianism, and centrally planned economies began to conflict with notions of individual rights, and societies such as constitutional republics that protect individual freedoms.

Those in favor of centralization argue that planned economies are vastly more efficient at moving goods and services, and are better able to utilize the talents of individuals in society for the common good. Those in favor of decentralization decry the squelching of human rights and individual freedoms, and argue that centralized societies inevitably become totalitarian, inhibit creativity, and are ruled by a privileged elite who use inflexible ideology to make people follow “the party line.” Those in favor of centralization counter that the inevitable evolution of free societies lead also to the establishment of wealthy elites who establish a modern-day privileged class and lord it over the people.

In the United States there is a lot of confusion about the political system we have. If you asked most citizens about this, they would say that the US is a democracy. On a very basic level, this is true. But the US is actually a constitutional republic. Our Constitution and Bill of Rights spell out explicitly what the government can and cannot do. The Bill of Rights guarantees individual rights for each citizen, and religious rights. The power of the central government is limited by the Constitution, and all powers not specifically granted to the central government are reserved to the states.

Here is what the 10th Amendment to the Constitution says:

"The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."

FindLaw says:

Passed by Congress in 1789 and ratified in 1791, the Tenth Amendment is the last in the group of Constitutional Amendments known as the Bill of Rights. Unlike several of the other early amendments, it is quite brief – only one sentence. But that one sentence grants state governments all powers not specifically delegated to the federal government by the Constitution. However, as broad a grant as this seems, interpretation by the Supreme Court has placed some limits on state power.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is meant by "reserved powers?"

“Reserved powers” refers to powers that are not specifically granted to the federal government by the Constitution. The Tenth Amendment gives these powers to the states.

What is an example of a reserved power?

Reserved powers include running elections, creating marriage laws, and regulating schools.

Why are reserved powers important?

Reserving powers for state governments helps maintain a balance of power between the states and the federal government. They also allow states the freedom to try out different ideas and programs, which is why states are sometimes called laboratories of democracy.”

Furthermore, in  Fry v. United States, 421 U.S. 542, 547 n.7 (1975), the 10th Amendment expressly declares the constitutional policy that Congress may not exercise power in a fashion that impairs the States’ integrity or their ability to function effectively in a federal system."

"The Tenth Amendment: Reserving Power for the States," https://constitution.findlaw.com/amendment10.html

Notice that the states are the laboratories of democracy, not the federal government. The Constitution and the Bill of Rights were written precisely to limit the power of centralization by the British crown, or any dictator or group of totalitarians, such as modern-day fascists and communists.

The states run elections and have always run elections, not the federal government in DC. It’s why some states are now looking into the corruption surrounding the 2020 election. The power to examine elections and ballots can be done, legally, by the duly elected legislature of each state.

There is good reason to limit the power of the central government.

In a democracy, the majority can trample on the rights of minorities. The Electoral College, for example, was designed to protect the rights of less populated states from the rule of big states. Those who favor abolition of the Electoral College, or packing the Supreme Court, have, most likely, not studied the U.S. Constitution and the checks and balances it creates to keep a stable political system. The recent riots in dozens of American cities, with billions of dollars in property damage, is a taste of what can happen when mob rule takes over. Totalitarian societies are always centralized, and are always based in intolerance for other points of view.

Here in the US there is now a debate between a populist movement that favors a smaller government and a larger private sector, and those who favor the communist, centralized model of a huge central government that plans the lives of all citizens. Under the guise of “COVID Relief Bills,” the central government in Washington DC and the Federal Reserve, the nation’s central bank, are literally printing trillions of dollars. Some businesses report that they cannot find employees because people are being “paid” more to stay home than going to work. Where this will lead is anyone’s guess, but one thing is certain: money is not wealth. As long as the amount of currency and credit in circulation balances the goods and services produced by the economy, the currency is stable, inflation is low, and the economy has the opportunity to run well. Merely printing money without a concomitant increase in the production of goods and services must lead inevitably to inflation and the debasing of the currency, which adversely affects the poor, the class least able to withstand the onslaught of inflation. Inflating the currency has been tried (and it has failed) throughout history, from the Roman Empire to the U.S. colonies, who attempted to print scrip to fund the Revolutionary War against the British crown. No one would take this currency, which were just pieces of paper backed by nothing valuable.

A centralized economy would be able to print massive amounts of money, whereas a decentralized  economy with a smaller central government and a large private sector would never be able to get away with it.

In short, centralized governments can never plan for the billions of decisions made every day by citizens. Centralized planning inevitably results in prohibition on thought, speech, and action to suit the demands of those in power. This is why centralized, totalitarian societies have always failed.

Centralization of politics in the United States has led to the placing of barriers and barbed wire around the Capitol, as a privileged political ruling class tries to protect itself from the people it is supposed to govern. Here in the US, HR 1 and SB 1, under the guise of “election reform,” will take control of decentralized elections from the state legislatures and give it to a corrupt central government, allowing for the party in power to maintain its power indefinitely. These election laws will, of course (for it is the modus operandi of centralization) – be backed by the coercive power of the State, where authority (and military power to enforce diktats) is concentrated.

In conclusion, human societies thrive when they are supported by the rule of law, and by the guarantee of liberty and freedom of thought and expression, which leads to creativity and powerful economic opportunities.  Although some centralization is necessary for good planning and rational public policy, too much centralization will lead to a sterile, apathetic society ruled by a privileged few.

Sometimes I think my life sucks. Right now I am dealing with a bulging disk in my back and it's really painful. Then I see things like this and understand that my life is a piece of cake compared to those brave souls who risk everything to expose the truth. Communism and fascism are totalitarian systems based on the same scientific materialism that is sweeping over the West today. Our connection to Spirit, to God, is something we must never lose. Or we lose our very souls and become slaves.

In the northeastern city of Changchun, China, a group of six ordinary people — a truck driver, a food vendor, a housewife, etc. — gathered in secret to plan an extraordinary task: to break into the television broadcasting system of the most tyrannical regime on earth – that of the Chinese Communist Party. Their goal was to expose one of the gravest, state sponsored, lies in Chinese history. A single lie used to justify the persecution of millions of people.

It was an event that sparked an information revolution that challenged oppressive regimes around the world, from Beijing to Tehran, and continues to reverberate today.

This is their remarkable story…

https://tv.faluninfo.net/defiance-in-the-kingdom-of-fake-news-documentary

After pointless and interminable war in Iraq and Afghanistan, two peace agreements were brokered by Trump before he left office. These peace agreements were between Israel and the United Arab Emirates, and Bahrain.

Here is a YouTube vid of one result of these agreements, which happened on March 1st. The Emerati Foreign Minister and the Israeli foreign minister are here congratulating each other on the formal normalization of relations.

Of course the forces of darkness hate these agreements. Anti-Semitism is on the rise as the warmongers see the inevitable tilt within the international community toward peace.

The move toward peace will be fought tooth and nail by the dark army, who portray Jews and Israel as an all-powerful, demonic state out to overthrow the world order.

This is patently ridiculous.

Look up Israel on a globe. It's a tiny, tiny state surrounded by much larger countries. The total world Jewish population is 14 million out of a total of almost 8 billion.

Jews throughout history have been attacked by despots, and modernly by Nazis, fascists, and communists. Yet, as of 2010, the entire world Jewish population is 13,428,300, representing 0.19% of the world's population.

Seriously folks, the rapprochement between Israel and the Arab world is good for world peace. Even small steps should be welcomed by all peace-loving people. The momentum toward peace is unstoppable now, which is why the dark is fighting so hard. Hell, even Trump was able to help the process along, even though the BIDEN junta has now begun to restart the wars in Syria, Afghanistan, and Iraq.

This is a temporary setback. The military-occupied and barricaded "citadel of our democracy" in DC will not long hold out against the will of the people, who are sick and tired of globalist / corporatist / endless war.

What are the two Native American moral principles?

1) Nothing must ever be done to harm the children.

2) All is born from woman.

Now look at the  evil that is assaulting our country. This evil is directly aimed at these two principles. Child trafficking and human trafficking (along with pedophilia and Satanic Ritual Abuse), drug running, and arms running. These three scourges go directly into our cities and undermine our economies and our young people. They are the three pillars of the Dark Economy. The purpose of the Dark economy is to destroy life. It’s product is death.

Many coyotes at the U.S. southern border that provide border crossing "services" also partner with sex trafficking rings. Many of these victims are children. According to the State Department, these coyotes transport sex trafficking victims to the US on behalf of gangs, cartels, and other trans-national criminal organizations. Amnesty International reports that well over half of all adult females will likely submit to “cuerpomátic,” a Spanish slang term meaning “rape in exchange for migration assistance into the United States." (See Bonello, Deborah and Erin McIntyre, “Is Rape the Price to Pay for Migrant Women Chasing the American Dream?” Splinter, 10 September 2014)

The idea that a man can “identify” as a woman directly violates the second Native principle. With all due respect to trans people, this is simply crazy talk. We see this when biological males who "identify" as females participate in women's sports, wrecking opportunities for women and girls. Actions like these dehumanize and attack women – as if women didn’t have enough problems in our male dominated society.

Vaccines are now being offered to protect against a virus that the population has long ago achieved herd immunity against, and which is now mutating into different strains. There is now talk of mandatory vaccination. Mandatory vaccination under the guise of public health simply uses the enforcement power of the State to squash human rights and freedom. It is a hallmark of totalitarian sociopaths.

Update 2/24: Here is a list of the ingredients in the Pfizer vaccine, from the CDC and FDA websites that describe the Emergency Use Authorization fact sheets for all vaccines that have received a EUA (https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-19/eua/index.html):

WHAT ARE THE INGREDIENTS IN THE PFIZER-BIONTECH COVID-19 VACCINE?
The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine includes the following ingredients: mRNA, lipids ((4-hydroxybutyl)azanediyl)bis(hexane-6,1-diyl)bis(2-hexyldecanoate), 2 [(polyethylene glycol)-2000]-N,N-ditetradecylacetamide, 1,2-Distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine, and cholesterol), potassium chloride, monobasic potassium phosphate, sodium chloride, dibasic sodium phosphate dihydrate, and sucrose

Source: FACT SHEET FOR RECIPIENTS AND CAREGIVERS
EMERGENCY USE AUTHORIZATION (EUA) OF
THE PFIZER-BIONTECH COVID-19 VACCINE TO PREVENT CORONAVIRUS
DISEASE 2019 (COVID-19)
IN INDIVIDUALS 16 YEARS OF AGE AND OLDER at https://www.fda.gov/media/144414/download

There are fact sheets and ingredient lists for all four vaccines (see the CDC site link above). I would love someone to explain the science behind this. What are these ingredients and how do they affect human biology? Without knowing the answers to these questions, it is foolish (in my opinion) to allow this stuff into your body. But hey, that's just me. I like to know before I go.

You don’t believe that the new COVID vaccines are experimental? Here is what the CDC and the FDA say about them:

WHAT IS THE [PFIZER-BIONTECH] COVID-19 VACCINE?

The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine is an unapproved vaccine that may prevent COVID-19. There is no FDA-approved vaccine to prevent COVID-19. The FDA has authorized the emergency use of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine to prevent COVID-19 in individuals 16 years of age and older under an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA).”

https://www.fda.gov/media/144414/download

The next step in the dark agenda is weaponizing food. Bill Gates has told us that we should stop eating meat and embrace phony meat substitutes like “Beyond Meat,” which Gates has himself invested in.

This is another psychological operation by the dark Army.

Gates is now the largest private landowner of farmland in the US. NPR reports that more and more farmland across the U.S. is foreign owned, including by CCP-owned companies.

The plan of the dark is to create more viruses. They are mainly used as economic weapons to enforce lockdowns and destroy small businesses, while keeping open big box stores run by the multinationals. The vaccines (whether they are effective or not) are a way for Big Pharma to make a lot of money, and are promoted by elements in the medical establishment (just watch the news to see who they are).

The opening of the U.S. southern border with the new immigration bill and Biden's new Executive Orders has two purposes:

1) Wage deflation. A massive influx of unskilled workers will compete against U.S. working class blacks, Hispanics, Asian, and poor white workers. This is the North American counterpart to the slave labor camps in China, run by the CCP. The globalist business model depresses wages all over the world while increasing the balance sheets of multinationals. Add phony, made up international “crises” that lead to endless foreign wars and you get the destruction of the working class and the middle class, as well as massive wealth redistribution to the elites

2) Create more voters for the globalist agenda. This starts with massive government giveaways which increase the size of government and destroy the currency, inviting uncontrolled immigration. Eventually the private sector disappears and the government is the only employer, and the economy is destroyed. This happens in all totalitarian societies. The focus is ALWAYS on destroying small business and entrepreneurs. Our southern border is completely controlled by the drug cartels, who traffic people, children, arms, and drugs.

Another pillar of the Dark is using race to split society apart. The Nazis used race very effectively to destroy German society and rise to power, what time they then demonized the Jews, put them in concentration camps, and murdered 6 million.

Does this sound familiar to the US of today?

Solutions

These Dark people are insane and can never succeed. BUT the dark can make us uncomfortable if we go into agreement with them.

What can you do personally?

1) Talk to your neighbors; form local communities.

2) Buy from LOCAL food producers (ranchers, farmers). Support LOCAL small businesses.

3) Do not take vaccines if you don’t know what is in them.

4) Do not listen to mainstream media. Or rather, listen but don’t automatically accept this information. These outfits are professional lie factories. They offer only narratives and propaganda.

5) Use your personal discernment. In this age of disinformation, asymmetrical warfare, and economic warfare, pass all information through your personal discernment filter. TRUST YOURSELF and your divine connection to God.

6) Keep in mind the two Native principles above. Our indigenous have kept their connection to Gaia and the Great Spirit. They are the emissaries of sanity in an insane world.

7) KEEP THE FAITH. Trust in God and humanity. The dark exists to propel evolution forward to a society where peace and cooperation become worldwide. Yes, it’s painful. But always look on the bright side! Try to be an inspiration to others.

Fossil fuels cause pollution and waste and are inefficient sources of energy. Replacing fossil fuels with clean energy should be a priority for national energy policy.

But not like this.

GreenTechnology.jpg
How stupid is this?

A picture is worth a thousand words. The absurdity of a fossil-fuel powered vehicle towing another fossil fuel powered generator charging an electric car is just dumb.

In this vid, we see a GM spokesperson showing off an electric car. Somebody asks her what is powering the electric car battery. Listen until the very end when she realizes that the coal-fired energy plant powering the building is also powering the electric car.

I’m all for getting rid of fossil fuels. But we need a rational green strategy. Electric cars aren’t going to cut it.

There isn't Enough Electricity

Toyota CEO agrees with Elon Musk: We don't have enough electricity to electrify all the cars:

Toyota CEO Akio Toyoda’s comments at the company’s year-end press conference deserve notice and no little amount of respect. He knows more about cars and their economic ecosystem than just about anyone else on the planet:

The Wall Street Journal was in attendance and noted the CEO’s disdain for EVs (electric vehicles) boils down to his belief they’ll ruin businesses, require massive investments, and even emit more carbon dioxide than combustion-engined vehicles. “The current business model of the car industry is going to collapse,” he said. “The more EVs we build, the worse carbon dioxide gets… When politicians are out there saying, ‘Let’s get rid of all cars using gasoline,’ do they understand this?”

CarBuzz has mischaracterized Toyoda’s comments. It’s not “disdain for EVs” he’s expressing. It’s disdain for the failure to count the cost of what politicians are proposing. More EVs will demand more electricity.

Toyoda is getting at two things. One, EVs are not powered by magical unicorn emissions, they are powered by the means we use to generate electricity. In Japan, the United States, and everywhere else, that’s fossil fuels to the tune of a huge majority of our electric power generation (61% in the U.S., with wind and solar making up about 17%...

If the politicians who are pushing to ban gas cars and force everyone over to EVs with renewables at their present or near-future state of development do understand any of this, they’re not letting on. They’ll wreck modern industry.

Toyoda isn’t alone in this reality check. Elon Musk recently sounded a similar note. Note well that he also has no “disdain” for EVs. He’s building his empire on EVs, and his Teslas make EVs flashy and desirable. Yet he’s sounding a similar warning to Toyoda’s.

Perhaps two of the world’s leading car experts should be listened to before Tokyo, Washington, or any other capital follows California’s lead and bans gas cars without considering the ripple effects

https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/bryan-preston/2020/12/21/toyota-ceo-agrees-with-elon-musk-we-dont-have-enough-electricity-to-electrify-all-the-cars-n1222999

Disposal Problems

Electric cars are supposed to be more environmentally friendly, avoiding the stink and pollution of fossil fuel vehicles. But there’s another side to this story.

The disposal of used electric batteries poses a terrible pollution problem, similar to that of nuclear waste.

More than 1 million electric vehicles were sold worldwide in 2017. The study authors estimate that those cars alone will ultimately result in 250,000 tons of discarded battery packs. If those were to end up in landfills, they’d run the risk of going through a process called “thermal runaway,” which is basically a chemical reaction in the battery that can cause it to heat up, potentially to the point of burning or exploding. (It’s the reason why TSA prohibits spare lithium-ion batteries in checked baggage when you board a plane.)

The electric vehicle industry needs to solve its battery  disposal problem.

https://www.theverge.com/2019/11/6/20951807/electric-vehicles-battery-recycling

How much waste would be generated if millions more electric cars were sold each year?

Moreover, batteries used in electric cars contain cobalt. Two-thirds of the world’s cobalt production comes from the Democratic Republic of the Congo, a communist dictatorship that sends tens of thousands of African kids into mines, scrabbling and retrieving cobalt. These kids get sick and even die.

From CNBC: “The African nation supplies more than two thirds of the world’s cobalt but human rights groups have raised concerns that the industry relies on child workers.”

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/06/16/tesla-glencore-cobalt-gigafactory.html

Oops. We don’t worry too much about the inconvenience of human rights in our Brave New World run by AI, Big Tech, and multilateral corporations interested only in the bottom line.

While virtue-signaling drivers in the West proudly show off their electric cars – trying to solve a global warming problem that might not even exist – African kids are being exploited and dying. Battery waste is piling up.

Pesky problems like human rights get brushed under the rug in the name of economic “progress” and climate change activism. This is the new scientific materialist technocratic state that is being pushed by Big Tech and our “elites.”

The “new normal” and “build back better” doesn’t include real research into clean, unlimited sources of energy. It’s about time we as a nation rearranged our priorities.

Changing Energy Research Priorities

We need a massive investment in R & D to study overunity devices – devices that can take energy from the vacuum, or utilize what Tesla called “cosmic energy.” We need to study the push-pull effect of permanent magnets, which hold their charges indefinitely. Properly arranged, permanent magnets could turn a generator rotor or induce a flow of current through a wire.  

Instead, we get absurd “Green New Deals” that rely largely on fossil fuel technologies, and use conservation to make people do without. Meanwhile, the elites fly on private jets and live in mansions with the carbon footprint of small towns.

The United States is known for its ability to innovate. Let’s get off the fossil fuel bandwagon and on to some real research into frontier physics. We can do it! It will be public money well spent.

Update 2/24:

Mexico gives up on renewables, revives coal industry

Mexico, the eleventh biggest population on Earth, was all enthused about renewables a few years ago, but now they are actively winding back wind and solar and reactivating coal projects. Mines are being reopened, coal miners are being hired and the state owned Federal Electricity Commission (CFE) has been told to buy electricity from its own coal generators before they buy electricity from the privately owned renewables generators."

https://joannenova.com.au/2021/02/un-greening-mexico-gives-up-on-renewables-revives-coal-industry/

NPR reports that China is building more than 300 NEW coal-fired energy plants around the world. Why? Because renewables aren't reliable as of yet. We need a lot more research into non-fossil fuel solutions.

Update 4/10-2021:

Solar panels (another green energy source) are also beginning to create pollution problems. Wired magazine states in an article titled, Solar Panels Are Starting to Die, Leaving Behind Toxic Trash: Photovoltaic panels are a boon for clean energy but are tricky to recycle. As the oldest ones expire, get ready for a solar e-waste glut:

Solar panels are an increasingly important source of renewable power that will play an essential role in fighting climate change. They are also complex pieces of technology that become big, bulky sheets of electronic waste at the end of their lives—and right now, most of the world doesn’t have a plan for dealing with that.

But we’ll need to develop one soon, because the solar e-waste glut is coming. By 2050, the International Renewable Energy Agency projects that up to 78 million metric tons of solar panels will have reached the end of their life, and that the world will be generating about 6 million metric tons of new solar e-waste annually. While the latter number is a small fraction of the total e-waste humanity produces each year, standard electronics recycling methods don’t cut it for solar panels.

https://www.wired.com/story/solar-panels-are-starting-to-die-leaving-behind-toxic-trash/

"Helping the environment" by buying electric cars and using solar panels is not a panacea for a green earth because these technologies create enormous pollution problems. A massive change in national energy research is needed.

Biden got 80 million votes! Where is everyone?

In my last post (Something Big Is Coming) I naturally assumed that because of such an alarming military buildup -- with at least 30,000 National Guard troops, a no-fly zone over the city, barricades everywhere, Patriot missile batteries deployed, closing of all waterways by the Coast Guard -- surely the Capitol was expecting a massive attack by some very well-armed and violent extremist group.

But the answer is much simpler than that: Paranoia! The globalist/endless war elites are terrified of the people they are supposed to govern. That's why they barricaded DC. This is why they talk about a "new normal."

The new normal -- backed up by the power of the State -- makes sure that the plebes think the right way (Big Tech suppression of free speech), say the right things, and act the right way. What we saw in DC today is the forced barricading of an unpopular junta from the people. It's what the "elites" are planning for the rest of America. The only question in my mind is, what is the next manufactured crisis? Where in the world is the next regime change war? How many American soldiers will have to die to satisfy the greed of the military-industrial-complex?

Update Jan 21: Don't laugh. Look at this:

"Growing terror threats in the region." Yup. It's only been ONE DAY since BIDEN took office! Welcome to the "new normal." Or should I say, the old normal?

Update Jan 22: National Guard Troops continue to arrive in DC! WTF?

The Goal of the "New Normal"

Here, in a video by Don Winslow (I will not give the link to it), is a summary of the "new normal" our "elites" want to build in America:

They are hidden among us, disguised behind regular jobs.

They are your children’s teachers. They work at supermarkets, malls, doctor’s offices, and many are police officers and soldiers.

In this new war, the battlefield has changed. Computers can be more valuable than guns.

And this is what we need now more than ever: an army of citizen detectives.

I’m proposing we form a citizen army.

Our weapons will be computers and cellphones. We, who are monitoring extremists on the internet and reporting our findings to authorities.

Remember, before the Navy Seals killed Osama Bin Laden, he had to be found. He was found by a CIA analyst working on a computer thousands of miles away.

It’s up to you.

Simply replace the Orwellian word "detective" with "State informant" (its true meaning) and you have the correct interpretation. This program pits family member against family member, and neighbor against neighbor, just as in the fascist/communist states of the Soviet Union, Nazi Germany, and Communist China. The goal: break up the family, the fundamental unit of a healthy society. This is a call to turn America into an Orwellian nightmare.

Mr. Winslow is right: it's up to you to embrace tyranny or freedom, liberty or communism.

The political goal of the New Normal is to create a true one-party state with rigged elections and eliminate all opposition. Just as all totalitarian dictatorships do. (So much for "protecting democracy.") And no, this isn't about Republicans and Democrats. Both parties long ago merged into an Establishment party some are calling the Uniparty.

Now is the time for all good men and women to come to the aid of their country.

1 Comment

When I first saw this article (below) I thought it was lunacy. Then I read the whole thing. Apparently there are people who actually think this is a good idea! Forewarned is forearmed, I guess. Ignorance is not bliss. You have to read all the way to the end to understand the wet dream of the globalist/corporate/fascist/communist "new normal" Global Reset crazies.

I wouldn't even bother posting this lunacy, except that the State of Michigan (my home state) plans to vaccinate 70% of the population (5.6 million people) by the end of 2021.

Source: https://www.michigan.gov/documents/coronavirus/MI_COVID-19_Vaccination_Prioritization_Guidance_710349_7.pdf

BIDEN has announced that his administration will set up thousands of local "clinics" to distribute the mRNA bio-device all over the country.

So, apparently, these plans are not just wet dreams; they are being executed. Stay informed.

Article excerpt:

Things won’t get back to normal until we have gotten a vaccine out to the entire world” – Bill Gates

Nothing here is speculation. I will just present the facts and evidence, and you can form your own conclusions.

Bill Gates, along with Robert Langer of MIT, have developed a human implantable quantum dot tattoo micro-needle vaccination delivery system, which will also double as proof of vaccination.
Firstly, we have the never-tested on humans mRNA based COVID-19 vaccination that he wants to give every person on earth.

Then there will be quantum dot micro-needles, a digital identification mark, in the form of a dye under the skin, a sort of tattoo that can be detected with special light and/or scanners.

The ink or dye required is called Luciferase.

And lastly, either a implantable microchip, or more likely; the same type of nanoparticles used as a delivery system of mRNA vaccines will act as transmitters once inside the body, transmitting every detail about you in real time, including exactly what you are doing, and you will be rewarded with a centralized cryptocurrency for performing approved tasks. Of course you may also be penalized as well, if you do something to displease Gates.

This is all detailed in a patent filing, numbered; WO2020060606.

https://carter-heavy-industries.com/2020/11/15/id2020-bill-gates-luciferase/

Click on the link and read the entire article to understand the sweep and scope of this plan.