Random Thoughts:

I find it very interesting that President Bush is so anxious to send our troops all over the world, leaving the United states itself undefended. Is that a rational policy for a Commander in Chief? I don't think so! I always thought that the purpose of the United States armed forces was to protect the territory of the Unites States. But the mission of the military, over the past 50 years, has been extended to embrace an elusive concept called "national security." What is national security? Well, apparently it's anything the President says it is. (National Security isn't a creation of President Bush. Democratic and Republican presidents have used this concept to attack VietNam, Grenada, Panama, and Iraq (among others), but president Bush has raised the god of national security to new heights).

Unfortunately, an examination of the military files of George W. Bush within the context of US Statutory Law, Department of Defense regulations, and Air Force policies and procedures show that George W. Bush was considered a deserter by the United States Air Force.[1] It was bad enough when we had Clinton as Commander in Chief. But at least Clinton didn't pretend he was some kind of war hero -- that guy was dishonest in other areas.

Interesting is it not? This is the same chap (Bush Jr.) who proposed selling off the interstate highway system of the United States to the highest bidder. Those of you who weren't around in the 1950's may not understand that the interstate highway system was built to move troops and materiel quickly around the country in case of attack.

What is the rationale behind the War in Iraq?
President Bush said that it was to remove "weapons of mass destruction," but of course that was false.
Some people say the war in Iraq is about oil, and there is probably some truth to that.
What people don't know is that Saddam Hussein's"personal bank," The Rafidian Bank[2], contained several trillion dollars in gold and other assets. Christopher Story, noted British intelligence analyst, points out that in his opinion, The War in Iraq began as a bank raid, and was designed to steal the quite considerable assets of this bank.[3]

It is difficult for me to understand how so many can be taken in by the war on terrorism and the war in Iraq. I see these efforts as ways to undermine the Constitution and destroy freedom. I see the passage of the Patriot Acts, the Real ID Act and the Military Commissions Act of 2006 as a blatant attempt to destroy freedom at home, while our brave men and women in the armed forces fight for some elusive "national security" abroad. Underneath the radar of the mainstream media is an entire matrix of globally significant events which, if these became known to the American people, would never be tolerated.

As I point out on my website, when you have no idea of your basic spiritual nature, you do really dumb things. But I am very optimistic about the future. I believe that the consciousness of human beings on planet earth is raising to a higher vibration, and that lies, corruption and deceit must and will be exposed.

[1] see http://www.glcq.com/bush_at_arpc1.htm#_Bush%92s_Record_as
[2] see "Republic of Iraq" http://72.14.203.104/search?q=cache:lXGdh9RHzD8J:
www.hsbcnet.com/public/tcm/cibm/pcm/pdf/iraq.pdf+Rafidain+bank&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=15&gl=us
[3] According to Story:" The attack on Iraq was a bank raid. Among its key objectives were (a) to seize control of the Central Bank of Iraq and to seize its gold. We were informed two years or so ago that about 100 special operatives involved in this operation were killed when they were deliberately left ‘in harm’s way’ by the US military; but we now understand that this figure was much higher. These people were sacrificed so that they would not survive to report what happened. Knowledge of this assault, giga-theft and atrocity exists because the events were recorded by several Iraqi sources. The second objective (b) was to obtain control over Saddam Hussein’s ‘personal’ bank, Rafidain Bank, so that the General Management could be changed and then instructed to grant access to what we were told amounted to $17 trillion of assets, but which we now understand is a far higher figure. These assets are reported to be held at the London branch, and may have been frozen or stolen by the British authorities, who appear to be heavily involved in these scams."
See http://www.worldreports.org/news/36_high-level_criminals

Seem fantastic? It does to me! At the very least, entertaining.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *