The Australian essayist and social commentator “Unbekoming” has written a brilliant essay on the topic of conspiracy theories. He bases his article on the work of political scientist Michael Parenti. Here are a few excerpts from the essay:
“Coal miners consciously direct their efforts toward advancing their interests. So do steelworkers, small farmers, and schoolteachers. Labor unions exist precisely because workers concert together to pursue collective goals. No one calls this a conspiracy theory. It is called organizing.
“But suggest that the wealthy and powerful consciously concert with intent to defend their class interests, and you have crossed an invisible line. You are now a conspiracy theorist, a crank, possibly paranoid.
“Political scientist Michael Parenti put it directly: ‘It is allowed that farmers, steelworkers, or schoolteachers may concert to advance their interests, but it may not be suggested that moneyed elites do as much—even when they actually occupy the top decision-making posts. Instead, we are asked to believe that these estimable persons of high station walk through life indifferent to the fate of their vast holdings.’
“The double standard operates silently. Workers scheme; owners sleepwalk. The public pursues its interests; elites stumble through history moved by forces beyond their comprehension or control. This is the unexamined premise that makes “conspiracy theory” an effective slur.”
In other words, the Great Unwashed, in their attempt to probe into the hidden affairs of billionaires and wealthy elites, are mentally ill. But behind the scenes it is perfectly OK for the wealthy to sit and plan in their boardrooms and in their forums like the UN, the World Health Organization, the World Economic Forum, and the Bank for International Settlements, the central bankers’ central bank.
…Parenti wrote: “’Conspiracy’ refers to something more than just illegal acts. It serves as a dismissive label applied to any acknowledgment of ruling-class power, both its legal and illegal operations.” The term functions not as a descriptor but as a weapon—a thought-terminating cliché that protects the powerful from scrutiny by pathologizing those who scrutinize them.
“Conspiracy denial, in Parenti’s analysis, is not skepticism. It is the opposite of skepticism. It is credulity toward power dressed up as critical thinking.
“As he wrote in Dirty Truths: ‘Just because some people have fantasies of conspiracies does not mean all conspiracies are imaginary.’”
Ruling Class Conspiracy Theories
An example of a ruling-class conspiracy theory is Climategate in 2009.
In November of that year, 61 megabytes of confidential files leaked on the internet from the University of East Anglia’s Climatic Research Unit in the UK. The emails and documents showed that global warming establishment “scientists” were “manipulating data, suppressing dissent, evading transparency laws, and privately admitting their models didn’t work while publicly insisting the science was settled.” This scandal should have ended the global warming debate – but it didn’t. Why? Because the global warming scam involves trillions of dollars for climate stakeholders.
Official enquiries found nothing wrong, and the mainstream media called those who questioned global warming “conspiracy theorists.” The Climate Change agenda proceeded as if nothing had happened.
Why did so many powerful people have so much invested in ensuring the global warming agenda? Agenda 21, signed by 179 countries. Agenda 21 puts unelected bureaucrats in global organizations in charge of land use and resource consumption in all 179 countries. The goal is to place powerful people at the top of planet earth’s $100 trillion resource pyramid. We discussed this in earlier articles on Global Governance.
Sound familiar? Placing a few in charge of the billions – of the entire planet! – is classic psychopathy.
I used to think that global conspiracies were the product of paranoid and mentally unbalanced minds. But when I studied psychopathy I realized that that the goal of psychopaths IS to gain as much power as possible. Seen in this light, the COVID scam, Agenda 21, depopulation, and Global Governance aren’t just delusional fantasies. They make perfect sense. Humanity has just not realized the effect that a few percentage points of the population can have on the rest of us.
Because the wealthy and powerful hide their intentions and activities, investigators do not have all the data. Many conspiracy theories are educated guesses by serious researchers using the available information.
Because exposure is the enemy of the psychopath, the work of investigators such as Unbekoming, Whitney Webb, George Webb, Candace, escapekey, Elizabeth Nickson, Sasha Latypova, and dozens of others are essential. They aren’t always right but they make us aware of events, people, and situations that the controlled mainstream never mentions.
The origin of the term “conspiracy theory”
The term conspiracy theory was coined after public skepticism of the Warren Commission Report on the assassination of President Kennedy. The Zapruder film, fully released in 1975, gave every American a chance to see what actually happened. That evidence doesn’t fit with a shot from behind JFK on the sixth floor of the Texas Book Depository building. After watching the film dozens of times, I see that JFK’s head snapped backwards and to the left, indicating to me that he could not have been shot from behind. I’m no ballistics expert, so see for yourself. The Zapruder film is only 29 seconds long.
Conspiracy deniers
Today’s mass shootings, where police body cam footage, documents, camera and phone recordings, and other evidence should be readily available to investigators, often aren’t. All modern assassinations utilize the tried and tested “lone gunman” theory. If you don’t believe me, start with JFK and look them up, there are dozens of them. It’s kinda in the Assassin’s Media Playbook: yet another lone lunatic – without help from anyone else – magically pulls off the crime and is conveniently arrested or killed. Case closed, nothing to see here!
After the shooting of Charlie Kirk, literally the entire crime scene was roped off, paved, painted over, and sanitized, preventing investigators from examining the crime scene. In Butler, PA, FBI agents were filmed hosing down the roof of the building where Thomas Crooks was shot dead. The shooter’s body was cremated on July 23, 2024, ten days after the assassination attempt on Donald Trump. .
Authorities today, just as in 1963, seem more interested in covering up crimes than solving them. Apparently, the powerful have no qualms about creating conspiracy theories to protect themselves. They are, in effect, conspiracy deniers.
It’s why “conspiracy theorists” are needed. Serious researchers unearth inconvenient facts. This information can often negate mass media attempts to quickly formulate a Narrative that may conveniently hide the real conspiracy theory – the “official” version of events.
It’s also why censorship is necessary for the perpetrators. Accusations of “misinformation” and “disinformation” can act to hide or provide cover for criminal activity.
Summary
A conspiracy theorist is very often a serious researcher using available information to expose the nefarious activities of the wealthy and powerful, or State actors who use controlled media to hide crimes.
A conspiracy denier is one who does not believe that the wealthy and powerful organize to defend and expand their interests. Conspiracy deniers pillory those who investigate them.
Posted inNews and Politics|Comments Off on Conspiracy Theories and Conspiracy Deniers
This essay is a follow up to The Problem of Psychopathy Part II, which asked the question: Are psychopaths made by their environment, or are they born that way?
This is a vital question because psychopathic personalities disrupt groups, organizations, and even nations. I don’t personally know the people behind the drugs that are inundating our cities and killing over 100,000 people every year, but I’d bet they are psychopaths.
This can be said for every social ill the country is currently suffering from. Like the scorpion who kills the frog that carries him across the river, it is the nature of the psychopath to cause harm to others. This occurs because psychopaths care little for the consequences of their actions. Anti-social personalities cannot see beyond the limitations of Self (See diagram 2 below).
“[A psychopath is] a person with a personality disorder indicated by a pattern oflying, cunning, manipulating, glibness, exploiting, heedlessness, arrogance, delusions of grandeur, sexual promiscuity, low self-control, disregard for morality, lack of acceptance of responsibility, callousness, and lack of empathy and remorse. Such an individual may be especially prone toviolent and criminal offenses.” — American Heritage dictionary
This definition is all-encompassing, describing just about every evil there is.
Psychopaths are at most 4% or 5% of the population, according to a 2021 study. Robert D. Hare, who wrote the book on psychopaths, Without Conscience, says that they are only 1% of the population.
Yet their influence is massive.
The psychopath sees little else on the dynamics of life but Self.
Figure 1. The dynamics of life.
Figure 2. Psychopaths are truncated on the dynamics of life
Psychopathic personalities present a serious, but unrecognized, social issue. “Evil triumphs because good men do nothing” aptly describes the problem of psychopathy. Our society is rife with fraud, abuse, criminality, and violence, the purview of the psychopath. Yet “cracking down” or even criticizing persons with harmful and anti-social characteristics is termed “discrimination” or “intolerance” or “fascism” in today’s politics.
If a society is unable to defend itself from anti-social personalities, it will surely crumble.
Criticizing those who criticize harmful behavior is itself a characteristic of the psychopath. It is a way for the psychopath to deflect his or her tendency toward cruelty and harm onto others.
When psychopaths control the narratives of society, a curious and destructive phenomenon occurs: the words and actions of anti-social personalities are what cannot be discussed or criticized. When psychopaths rail and retaliate against those who point out their antisocial activities, we say we are over the target. For example, those who criticize drag queens who expose their genitals in public places in front of children are called “homophobic” (and much worse) by psychopaths.
What appears to be a social “movement” can really be what Mathias Desmet calls “mass formation psychosis.”
Adolf Hitler speaks at a rally in Nazi Germany. 10,000 people attend. 95% are there to listen. A very few percent are supporters. The speaker uses powerful language to inflame the crowd’s emotions. The key operative is one psychopath: Hitler, who decided the fate of an entire nation, and changed the world for the worse.
J.K. Rowling is one of the most successful authors in history. She has been relentlessly attacked for defending women and stating that sex is real – something that a five-year-old understands. She has had rape threats and death threats. Institutions she funded have organized campaigns to remove her name. Actors from her own film adaptations have publicly denounced her – simply for having an opinion. This has happened to other influencers in a similar way. Who is behind these efforts? More than likely, a few psychopaths. It’s what they do.
Treating a psychopath as just a normal citizen exposes society to their destructive nature. However, for countries founded on the principle that all are created equal, targeting them is a violation of civil liberties. Adding to the problem is the difficulty of even identifying a psychopath. These personalities can be very glib and charming, and know how to insinuate themselves into groups and organizations.
And so, generation after generation, conflict and contention continue. Caused by the very few.
The Bigger Picture View of Psychopathy
There may be a simple, purely environmental explanation for psychopathy: Parents who themselves were abused, abuse their children and they in turn become anti-social personalities. However, this does not explain why severely abused girls like Cathy O’Brien (Trance-Formation of America), Susan Ford aka Brice Taylor (Thanks for the Memories), Juliette Engel (Sparky), and Sue Arrigo (I Spent 20 Years as a CIA Sex Slave) did not become anti-social. Each found a way to re-integrate their personalities and become helpful to others.
A purely environmental explanation for psychopathy cannot account for their recovery.
There is a common denominator for all four of these MKUtra-ed women. All shared a deep spirituality or faith to sustain them while they were being tortured and mind controlled, and afterward as they sought recovery. All of them say they accessed non-corporeal beings (guardian angels, if you will) who guided and comforted them.
In our ruthless secular society, angels and non-physical personalities are regarded as delusions, and the people who claim to speak with them as nutjobs. Nevertheless, there are times when life–threatening situations put a physical being in contact with non–physical energy. Such claims may be assigned to an overactive imagination, but I prefer to take a person at his word. The incident described below occurred on July 18, 2004.
“NEW YORK (AP) Dale Earnhardt Jr. has trouble remembering those frantic seconds when he escaped from his burning racecar. He believes, however, that his late father figured in his survival.
I don’t want to put some weird, you know, psycho twist on it like he was pulling me out or anything, but he had a lot to do with me getting out of that car,” the NASCAR star said. “From the movement I made to unbuckle my belt to lying on the stretcher, I have no idea what happened.”
Earnhardt recalled that perilous July day in Sonoma, Calif., during an interview with correspondent Mike Wallace for 60 Minutes that will be broadcast Wednesday on CBS.
Earnhardt’s father was killed three years ago during the final lap of the Daytona 500. The son insists he felt his father’s presence on the day when he scrambled out of his flaming car and was left with second-degree burns on his legs, neck and chin. In fact, he said, when he reached safety, he began inquiring about the “person” who helped him from the car.
Earnhardt told 60 Minutes he grabbed one of his representatives by the collar, “screaming at him to find the guy that pulled me out of the car. He was like, ‘Nobody helped you get out,’ and I was like, ‘That’s strange be-cause I swear somebody … had me underneath … my arms and was carrying me out of the car.”’
Wallace asks whether that was his father.
“Yeah, I don’t know,” Earnhardt said. “You tell me. It … freaks me out today just talking about it. It just gives me chills.”
Neal Donald Walsh, author of Conversations With God, hit rock bottom and then discovered his connection to non-physical consciousness, as have many others.
A personal note
I understand communication with the non-physical because I have personal experience with it. For several years before he died in 2005, my father and I would have phone conversations every Saturday morning (I live in Michigan, he was in California). Like many father-son relationships, my dad and I got along best when separated by a lot of distance! Imagine my surprise when, during my daily walk, I felt him with me just a couple of days after his death. It was like he never really died at all; we just continued a well-established activity. The feeling of it was… astonishing and incredible. I began to ask him questions about life that we often discussed during our phone conversations. But these conversations were even deeper than before. Every day, for about a half-hour – the duration of my walk – we’d “talk” about life, the universe, and everything. When I got home I would write down these conversations, which lasted for about two weeks. Eventually I put them into a little book I titled I Love You Dad.
This experience taught me that you don’t have to be in life threatening situations to contact people close to you, and that yes, the origin of consciousness is non-physical.
A similar situation occurred in 1954, after my mother died of leukemia at the age of 28. When I toddled up to the coffin and saw her body, I didn’t see anything unusual, but I felt her presence. She told me that she wasn’t really dead; that a person continues after the body dies. That experience, at the age of three, generated in me a lifelong interest in spirituality and the nature of consciousness.
Inspired by Neale Donald Walsh, at the turn of the millennium I wrote a book titled Dialogues: Conversations with My Higher Self. In this book I asked all of the esoteric questions religion was never able to answer to my satisfaction. The answers I received came from…I called it the Higher Self (see Figure 3 below).
Even though I’m certain about everything I write regarding spirituality, I can’t prove any of it. This is frustrating for me because I’m a practical guy who wants scientific proof for my claims. But I know I’m not going to get it. I’m well aware that I’m a 4-Sigma oddity; someone who is way out of the mainstream. That is why I wrote a math/geometry textbook about three-dimensional solids titled A Geometric Analysis of the Platonic Solids and other Semi-Regular Polyhedra. I did this to show that I’m not an airhead, and have the capacity for rational thought.
Incarnation and Karma
I’m boring on about spirituality and consciousness because, to fully account for psychopathy (or any intractable human problem), we must engage with the spiritual system on earth, and the quintessential nature of a human being. In a previous essay, we went over an alternative explanation for what a human being is: a meld between a physical body and a non-corporeal conscious personality that survives the body’s death. (See Figure 3 below.)
The non-physical personality, through all physical lifetimes, experiences continuous, unbroken self-awareness. Where the being “goes” after death is not important to me. Some call it the between-lives area, some call it Heaven, some call it a return to universal or cosmic consciousness.
I call it Native State, which refers to consciousness in its native, non-corporeal state. By Native State I mean that the physical reality is a sort of dream state, a sophisticated illusion, and the true reality is the non-physical state of expanded consciousness.
Figure 3 The solid black bar represents the unbroken, continuous nature of consciousness. No matter the number of births and deaths, self-awareness never ceases. From the perspective of the physical being, the large star-like object (representing the complete non-physical personality) is the “higher self.”
Is the inherent nature of consciousness benign, or can it be anti-social?
The literature is pretty much in agreement that when a person has a near-death experience, they experience a deep and profound feeling of love and serenity, often accompanied by an out-of-body experience. It is unlikely, in my view, that a being experiencing expanded consciousness could be psychopathic!
The antisocial personality must be associated only with earth and a physical lifetime.
We know karma exists. A sane spiritual system must hold mass murderers like Stalin or Hitler responsible for the consequences of their actions, even if it is in another lifetime!
The Las Vegas model of karma
There must be a way to preserve the benign inherent nature of non-physical consciousness with the punishment – or responsibility – for one’s actions on earth. The Las Vegas model works well: “What happens on earth stays on earth.”
We discussed this briefly in an earlier article.
It allows for free will in the physical lifetime, yet preserves the unsullied and pure nature of the soul. When a being leaves the physical (“death”) it deposits the entire record of its life, both good and bad, in the karmic filing system of earth. Some call this “storage” area the Akashic Record. After this spiritual data dump, the being returns to Native State, pure and unsullied, where it can review the lifetime and prepare for the next one. When the being is ready for another lifetime, it enters pure but must pick up the burden (or joy) of the record of its previous lifetimes. In this way a continuous recording of its earth experiences is preserved, as well as any karma it might have accumulated.
If the being continues, lifetime after lifetime, to be predominately negative, it will be oriented to the physical lifetime as an antisocial personality.
So the answer to the question, “Can a human being be born a psychopath?” is a qualified yes. The soul/Higher Self is always pure, but the physical expressions of that soul can come in with some baggage. If the person decides to go with the negative karma, lifetime after lifetime, he or she gradually descends in awareness of the dynamics of life until he or she can only see Self (See Figure 2 above).
Curing psychopaths?
Would a psychopath respond to a teaching that they are divine beings and that their consciousness continues after death of the body? I doubt it. The psychopathic personality is not aware of any area of life beyond Self and would laugh at such a suggestion. Moreover, the psychopath sees any kind of therapy as a pointless form of intrusion.
Perhaps it might work if they were taught this from birth. But given the secularism that dominates society at this time, the percentage of parents who believe this is very slim.
Imprisoning psychopaths (the Dick Cheney’s of the world) may be necessary to remove them from society – absent an effective therapy, which does not exist at this time.
Educating psychopaths – except, perhaps, at a very early age – is probably a losing battle.
Conclusions from this series of articles
Mankind has been dealing with the disastrous effects of psychopathy for millennia. It is deeply embedded in the historical record, the human psyche, and in the spiritual system on earth.
A ray of hope is the rapid evolution in human consciousness that is now in full swing. As a matter of course, this evolution is also causing the current social chaos as 8 billion human beings work out their collective karma on the Gameboard of Earth. This process will, I believe, eventually result in a state of higher human consciousness. And it should also resolve the problem of psychopathy. If the collective human karma finally gets resolved, the conditions that make psychopathic personalities will no longer exist. Consciousness evolution is “a rising tide lifts all boats” solution to psychopathy.
While we are waiting for this miracle, what can be done to protect society from this embedded psychic sickness?
Individuals, for their own safety and peace of mind, should gain the ability to recognize the psychopathic personalities among us. Once recognition occurs we can stop enabling psychopaths, and respond firmly and appropriately to their words and actions.
This book describes the actions of psychopaths in the United States at the highest levels. A first-hand account.
Warning: If you read this book you will never look at the world in the same way. The ultimate red pill.
You might ask, “Why bother to read books like this? Stay in the Light, stay positive.” I used to believe that focusing on the positive and ignoring the negative is the way through, because what you focus on you get more of. For me, that turned out to be a form of avoidance. To release karma and attain peace it is necessary to confront the dark side and understand the duality, both positive and negative.
If you want to clean out the filthy garage you have to confront the mess and get a little dirty in the process. But the reward is worth the effort.
Over the past 6,000 years a pattern of thought and action has been firmly established within human consciousness: fighting for power, influence, and resources.
Throughout history, in all cultures, individuals and groups who have gained technological/military superiority have used it to advance their influence and power at the expense of everyone else. The enlightened ones have been few and far between. Human beings have been playing a zero-sum game with each other for millennia.
This pattern of thought and action has been so firmly established that it has grown to monstrous proportions. It has resulted in a powerful, almost overwhelming vibration or resonance within human consciousness. It is so bad that we call it “human nature”: we say that the natural tendency for all human beings is to fight, not cooperate.
The easiest explanation for this behavior is that primitive man was constantly fighting the environment to survive, which naturally led to a mindset of struggle and competition.
However, as life has become easier over the past two centuries we have actually seen an increase in war and conflict. The 20th century was the bloodiest in human history, and the 21st isn’t setting records for good behavior.
It’s as if there is a source of antisocial-ness and conflict embedded in the psyche of humanity.
Why has fighting and conflict continued its dominance in human and international relationships?
The mindset of a psychopath aligns perfectly with the advancement of personal influence and power at the expense of others. Let’s take a look at definition 2 of a psychopath in the American Heritage dictionary:
“A person with a personality disorder indicated by a pattern of lying, cunning, manipulating, glibness, exploiting, heedlessness, arrogance, delusions of grandeur, sexual promiscuity, low self-control, disregard for morality, lack of acceptance of responsibility, callousness, and lack of empathy and remorse. Such an individual may be especially prone to violent and criminal offenses.”
Here we have “human nature” in its grossest and crudest form. I was a bit shocked when I read this definition, but then I thought about the people who engage in child trafficking, pedophilia, Satanic Ritual Abuse and Mind Control (MKULTRA), drug running, and arms trafficking. Reading the books of Brice Taylor and Cathy O’Brien document the activities of the psychopath, which cover every word of the above dictionary definition.
One or two of these traits are found in many people; that doesn’t make them psychopaths. However, the psychopath has most of them, particularly a lack of empathy and remorse, a disregard for morality or professional ethics, and a lack of responsibility.
Are psychopaths born or made?
Are psychopaths born with such twisted personalities, or are they the product of their environment? A little child who is sexually abused in the way described in the Taylor and O’Brien books may indeed be transformed into a psychopath. But if psychopaths are made in this way, why did these two women seek recovery and attain full integration of their personality?
If that is the case it would explain why, after 6,000 years of the present civilization, we still have not achieved social harmony.
My guess is that psychopaths somehow key-in to the dominant resonance of self-interest within the human psyche, and run with it. Paradoxically, it may be that the psychopath is more sensitive and intuitive than the rest of us, being able to pick up on the thoughts within mass consciousness. In this way – because psychopaths resonate to selfish and destructive behavior – these folks continue to enhance that resonance within the Human Thought Space, generation after generation. Their presence in any organization or group inevitably leads to confrontation and instability.
SMH. How can a person be born with such a degraded personality?
It is difficult for me personally to believe that a certain percentage of the human race is born with a tendency to psychopathy. Look into the eyes of any baby and tell me that kid is a psychopath. I won’t believe it. Perhaps there is another explanation for psychopathy, or at least a remedy we can use to improve human nature.
What if human nature is affected by how we define ourselves as human beings?
In a way, this is obvious. If a person is constantly told he or she is stupid, they will begin to think this way and will do stupid things and have low self esteem. (Either that or they will rebel and become an anger case. Both are dysfunctional.)
Perhaps human behavior doesn’t change because we have a wrong definition of what a human being is, and what human consciousness is. Some people even say that “human nature” cannot be changed.
I decided to consult two reputable sources and looked up human nature on the Encyclopedia Britannica site, and the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy site.
Brittanica said this:
“A broader problem [of defining human nature] is that of determining which ostensibly fundamental human dispositions and traits are natural and which are the result of some form of learning or socialization. Recent research in genetics, evolutionary biology, and cultural anthropology suggests that there is a complex interaction between genetically inherited factors and developmental and social factors. Basic drives shared with other primates are related to food, sex, security, play, and social status. Language use by humans is now generally recognized as genetically enabled, though the acquisition of any specific language also requires appropriate environmental stimuli. Some common behavioral differences between genders (e.g., regarding aggression) also appear to have a genetic basis, as does sexual orientation.”
Wow. This definition is typical of modern attitudes toward human beings, who are regarded as walking expressions of genes. The genes a person inherits are completely out of their control, of course, which turns the human being into a mindless biological meat robot.
The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy is even more confused about human nature:
“Alongside such varying and frequently conflicting normative uses of the expression “human nature”, there are serious disagreements concerning the concept’s content and explanatory significance—the starkest being whether the expression “human nature” refers to anything at all. Some reasons given for saying there is no human nature are anthropological, grounded in views concerning the relationship between natural and cultural features of human life. Other reasons given are biological, deriving from the character of the human species as, like other species, an essentially historical product of evolution.”
The definitions of consciousness on these two sites are even more confused, so I won’t bother listing them. For kicks I looked up “consciousness” on Wikipedia, the home of Orthodoxy. It says,
“its [consciousness] complex nature has led to extensive explanations, analyses, and debate among philosophers, scientists, and theologians for millennia. There is no consensus on what exactly needs to be studied, or even if consciousness can be considered a scientific concept. ”
With understanding of human nature and consciousness this muddled, is it any wonder our societies are breaking down?
Incredibly, after 6,000 years, we as a species still don’t know what a human being is.
With the above in mind, let’s take a stab at defining human nature and consciousness in a simpler, clearer, and more positive way.
The human being as a spiritual/physical meld
1) Human nature originates within the inherent nature of consciousness.
2) Consciousness exists independently of physical bodies.
3) Therefore, human consciousness does not come forth from, or originate in, the brain. When you die you are not dead; self-awareness continues.
4) Consciousness is self-awareness. More precisely, consciousness is the awareness of being aware. This definition is self-reflexive. It mirrors the process of perception, understanding what has been observed, and gaining wisdom and experience from what has been observed.
5) Human consciousness is a temporary melding of a non-physical personality with a physical body.
6) The degree of self-awareness distinguishes the depth of consciousness and the scope of awareness and perception.
7) Physical lifetimes separate consciousness into physical units via incarnation and create a being + body physical entity called the human being. Every human being experiences the world from different coordinates at all times, which leads to different perspectives. In this way, lifetime after lifetime, personalities are formed from each human being’s unique experiences.
Corollary: These unique personalities continue after death and expand in Knowledge during subsequent lifetimes.
8) Human consciousness (being + body) is finite but the conscious personality is immortal.
Corollary: Consciousness decreases entropy in the world by creating order from chaos in the physical universe. In other words, consciousness is not only the animating principle, but the organizing principle.
9) The ultimate purpose of an arc of physical lifetimes is to recognize that a greater reality exists outside the five senses of the body, and to discover the being’s inherent connection to Source/God.
These definitions expand the nature of a human being beyond the material, elevating people to divine creations within the material world.
The psychopath is the bent gear in the system.
Psychopaths can act to increase chaos if it causes harm to others. “Revolutionaries,” anarchists, and those who knowingly promote or commit violent acts with intent to harm (not self-defense) are psychopaths. Psychopaths also favor rigid, centralized control systems such as Global Governance. In this way they increase their own power and influence while strangling the life and creativity out of society.
Will redefining human consciousness magically remedy the human condition?
Who knows? We have never tried defining what a human being is in this way, on a whole-species basis. Presently, “authorities” define a human being as a walking meat-blob of gene expressions and firing neurons. This is a definition a psychopath might come up with!
What if we started teaching our children that they are immortal personalities and that when the body dies they continue on? Children are recently incarnated. They will understand this instinctively, unless someone beats it out of them. (If there is any resistance to this idea from a small child, that could be evidence for the “born a psychopath” theory.)
Perhaps our primitive human nature hasn’t matured because we teach our kids about fear, and that forever death is the ultimate end of every human being. That’s pretty scary and must create an inner tension, even in a child.
My friend Maurice Turmel has written a book about his bad experiences with religion and how he personally resolved them. Installing control systems in religion is the ultimate betrayal of a human being, for religion is supposed to connect a person to God, the Creative Source.
What sort of person would try to mess up a practice associated with finding enlightenment and God?
A psychopath, of course.
By ignoring the animating/spiritual component, the inherent divine nature of human beings and the continuity of consciousness is denied. This causes an inner tension throughout life, even if it is not consciously recognized.
Final thoughts
● We can characterize the nature of consciousness by saying that it is continuous and unbroken.
● Human nature reflects what human beings think of themselves. Elevating what we think of ourselves – re-defining what a human being is – may help to propel us to a higher state of consciousness and mitigate our tendency to fight and kill each other.
● The troubling reality that a certain percentage of people are antisocial or psychopathic may be remedied by adopting a new view of ourselves that postulates human consciousness as a meld between a physical body and an immortal, non-physical personality. If all endings are happy endings – that is, no matter how bad it gets the self-awareness of a person continues after the body takes it last breath – then the anxiety level of individuals about life will decrease, and their comfort level in life will increase.
● If a human being can be born with a psychopathic personality, realizing peace on earth may be a much harder but not impossible task.
NEXT: A Bigger Picture explanation for psychopathy.
Trump didn’t gaslight us. He was brutally frank about his reasons for extracting Nicolas Maduro, the quasi-legitimate ruler of Venezuela, who uses his programmed voting machines – now in 70 countries including the US and Europe – to steal elections. According to Trump, it’s all about Venezuela’s oil.
Here is the Department of Justice indictment of Maduro and his wife, unsealed in 2020, almost 6 years ago:
The U.S. legal position is that it is one of more than 50 other countries that do not recognize Nicolas Maduro as the legitimate President of Venezuela, and that the extraction operation was not regime change but a law enforcement arrest.
Here’s an alternative take on the Venezuela operation, which has a much larger focus: the corrupt international banking system that is kept afloat with of billions of liquid illegal drugs money.
🚨 While everyone watched Venezuela, Trump quietly put CANADA in the crosshairs.
Why? Because this isn't regime change—it's a strike on the City of London's offshore banking empire that's been laundering cartel money for 50 years.
— Thanks to my ex-Navy brother John for sending me this one.
My personal opinion is that Maduro and Trump negotiated a settlement.
Why would the US also take his wife? Why is Maduro doing a Trump dance? (You may have seen the vid of this. It’s hilarious and a bit surreal.) Why would a picture be taken of Maduro in a chair, giving two thumbs up, surrounded by DEA agents who are posing for the picture?
Seriously folks, we are watching a movie. Dude looks like an athlete who just finished a good workout.
Here’s our man Nicolas Maduro with his DEA buddies.
From GhostOfBasedPatrickHenry, my favorite international political commentator:
“I do think that this was a negotiated surrender between Maduro and Trump, not because Maduro is some ruthless dictator, but because Maduro is actually a cooperating witness who needs to be protected. I also think that Trump’s claims of the oil companies paying to rebuild the infrastructure of Venezuela could be reparations that are legitimately owed related to the lawsuits that were filed back in 2018 against dozens of the world’s most powerful oil executives, accusing them all of corruption and stealing Venezuela’s wealth. The lawsuit was filed by the Venezuelan oil company, PDVSA.”
Here is Ghost’s analysis of the situation as of 1/7/26:
There was also a larger, separate military objective to the extraction of Maduro: Showing Russia and China that the U.S. military is not a paper tiger:
“The U.S. mission—code-named Operation Absolute Resolve—has quickly become more than a political shockwave. Analysts have said it was also a real-world test of U.S. military power against a country that has spent years buying Chinese- and Russian-made air-defense systems and showcasing them as proof that it could deter Washington.
“The raid raised uncomfortable questions for Beijing about the limits of the Chinese-supplied systems that Venezuela has leaned on—especially “anti-stealth” radar that China advertised as capable of spotting and stopping U.S. stealth aircraft, a military analyst said.
“The analyst told The Epoch Times that the most damaging takeaway for China isn’t the failure of a single piece of equipment—it’s what the operation suggested about deeper weaknesses: corruption in China’s defense industry and lack of reliability of the technology and command structure meant to tie those systems together.”
— “How Chinese-Made Radar Defense Systems Failed in Venezuela,” the Epoch Times, Jan 7, 2026
The extraction of Maduro is typical Trump: Action on the big stage.
What can we conclude so far from all of this?
I conclude that Trump is working with Maduro and the President of Columbia to wreck the drug cartels and their corporate sponsors in some kind of kayfabe (fake) pro wrestling soap opera against the Deep State. If so, why Maduro was arrested is a mystery to me, unless he was in trouble with the cartels and needed a safe place to stay.
The easy explanation is that Trump is just a fascist and an imperialist who wants to aggressively enhance the declining American Empire.
However, after all the foaming and gnashing of teeth in the media, the Venezuelan government is still in place. During the operation, 32 Cuban operatives from the Revolutionary Armed Forces and the Ministry of the Interior were killed while defending Maduro. Analyst and former Special Forces Michael Yon says, “The extraction of Maduro and his wife was like taking the top leaf off the tree. The whole structure is still there, the whole Army, the government, all the gangsters, all the business people, is still in place.”
I also think Trump wants to troll the people who have tried to kill him three times and who have impeached him twice. The same group who developed the post-WW2 “Rules-based International Order,” which is and has always been a corrupt structure that enabled war and conflict for the benefit of the powerful.
And finally, the arrest of Maduro has to look good on the street and allow President Petro and Maduro – who have been waging war on the cartels for years – to save face by calling him a fascist and a dictator and an unprincipled barbarian (along with media all over the world). IMHO Trump’s aggressive rhetoric and the threats against President Petro of Columbia, and Petro’s response, is all part of the act.
It’s all thumbs-up, apparently.
Final Thoughts
In three years at the end of Trump’s term we will see who wins the economic war between the Chinese Communist Party and the US, and the Trump legacy will have been written. The CCP is active in every country in South and Central America – including Venezuela and Columbia – one of the reasons for the Trump 2.0 Monroe Doctrine. The CCP has insinuated itself within every sector of U.S. society from our national scientific laboratories to our universities. It won’t take longer than three years to see more clearly whether the surveillance/slave staters or the freedom lovers will win the minds and souls of the human race on this planet.
One thing is certain: The extraction of Maduro shows us once again that international law is what it has always been for the past four centuries: the powerful take what they want.
A certain percentage of the human race is antisocial. This has been noted by many psychologists, social researchers, and political commentators.
The lead definition of psychopath in the American Heritage Dictionary is, “A person who engages repeatedly in criminal and antisocial behavior without remorse or empathy for those victimized.”
The problem of psychopathy goes far beyond some greedy businessman who wants to monopolize hockey rinks! The release of clean energy technology to the world – and the creation of a potential golden age for humanity – is being suppressed for two good reasons:
1) If clean energy technology is released to the public, psychopaths around the world will find a way to weaponize it and use it to hold the world hostage for their advantage.
2) The petroleum/chemical energy empire generates trillions of dollars every year. Paychopaths who control our chemical and energy companies would much prefer to keep themselves at the top of the wealth and monetary pyramid.
According to Robert D. Hare’s revised “gold standard” Psychopathy Checklist (PCL-R), psychopaths are approximately 1.2% of the population. However,a recent study published at the NIH’s National Library of Medicine found a higher figure. The study analyzes 15 empirical studies in the scientific literature that calculated the frequency of psychopathy in the general adult population. It concludes that, after combining the results based on a total sample of 11,497 people, “The prevalence of psychopathy in the general adult population can be estimated at 4.5%.” — Source: “Prevalence of Psychopathy in the General Adult Population: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis,” García et al., Frontiers in Psychology, August 5, 2021.
Hare, in his second edition of the psychopath checklist, estimated the percentage of psychopaths in normal prison populations at 15.7% for males and 10.3% for females. For those who had committed homicide, the percentage of psychopaths was between 27.8% and 34.4%!
I wonder what the percentage of psychopaths is on Wall Street and in private equity? And in politics?
How many are there?
Out of a total human population of 8 billion, a lower-end estimate (1.2%) of the number of psychopaths on earth is about 96 million. At the upper end (4.5%) there are about 360 million psychopaths worldwide – approximately the population of the United States.
This means that in any small organization or group with 100 or more people, there is sure to be at least one psychopath, or as many as four, sabotaging the work of the group. In smaller groups such as a family or a circle of friends, you wouldn’t expect any psychopaths. However, in larger organizations like governments and multinational corporations, you have to expect more antisocial behavior.
Being completely self-centered and focused, psychopaths very often rise to the top of social and organizational pyramids. The rest of us are too busy taking care of our families and living our lives.
Organizations likely to attract psychopaths
The problem of psychopathy also involves the new Global Governance system being prepared and implemented worldwide. It is a system designed by antisocial persons.
What organizations would be most likely to attract a psychopath?
Well, psychopaths gravitate to centers of power, and would be naturally attracted to international organizations with influence on a national or planetary scale.
The private organizations that set standards for the entire world economy would surely be attractive to antisocial types.
“The people setting standards are a small group — maybe a few hundred — at institutions most people have never heard of.
“The Bank for International Settlements in Switzerland sets rules governing every major bank in the world, operating with legal immunity that no government can pierce. The IIASA in Austria produces the ‘black box’ computer models that end up driving climate policy globally. The FATF, which was created informally in 1989 without any legal basis and an open-ended mandate, now determines who can access the global financial system. In January 2026, a new body called GLOBAC will merge the world’s accreditation organisations, creating a single entity that decides which certifications are valid globally — meaning one body will determine who is qualified to participate in professional and commercial life worldwide. And major foundations like Rockefeller, Ford, Gates, and Open Society fund the research and advocacy that shapes what becomes accepted wisdom.
“These groups set what counts as normal. Governments, banks, platforms, and employers implement. By the time a rule affects you, it’s filtered through so many layers there’s no one person who made the decision.”
— escapekey.substack.com, “The One-Pager”
Psychopaths are personality types who, for some reason, are interested in controlling others. They would be attracted to a secretive international organization that wields tremendous power. We might call this set of people a private club. The club is antisocial because the principals – the people who run the show – are psychopaths. And therefore, the policies and directives issued by the club are anti-human. Thus is Global Governance born.
What is Global Governance?
Essentially, Global Governance assigns a monetary value to all of the earth’s resources: $4,000 Trillion at the latest count. Those resources are declared to be “owned” by the club. Each nation or designated group gets a “cut” assigned by the owners (as long as their compliance scores are adequate). Low compliance scores (determined by the club) denies access to resources, goods, and services.
These people have finally learned that brutality doesn’t work. They have devised a much cleverer and more effective system to control large populations: government by algorithm. Government by rules and regulations set behind the scenes without the messiness of voting and human decision-making or review. This system is truly global because nation-states and cultures are irrelevant in the eyes of Global Governance. Their policies are clearly anti-human.
One of the arguments I have heard debunking the “global controller” theory is, “human nature is too violent and competitive to have one group cooperating at the top, controlling an entire planet.”
Bullshit.
As long as there is enough power and wealth for everyone, psychopaths can get along well enough to accomplish the goals escapekey outlines in his brutally honest and finely detailed series on Global Governance.
An entire planet and $4,000 Trillion to divide is enough to keep even a group of antisocial personalities happy.
The nuts and bolts of Global Governance: Managing the billions
“The system runs on four steps that repeat across every area of life.
“First, someone decides what’s considered ‘normal.’
“International bodies and committees you’ve never heard of set standards for banking, health, climate, speech, and dozens of other areas. They’re not elected. They don’t even ask for your input. And should things go wrong, they do not accept responsibility. They just decide what’s acceptable, and what isn’t.
“Second, everything is monitored.
“Your phone tracks where you go. Your bank tracks what you buy. Social media tracks what you think and who you know. Satellites track what farmers plant in their fields. Medical systems track your health status. All this data flows into algorithms that build a complete picture of who you are, and what you do.
“Third, you get compared to ‘normal’.
“Algorithms calculate how well you fit within the acceptable range. You have scores you’ve never seen — risk scores, trust scores, health scores, threat assessments. These determine how the system ultimately treats you.
“Fourth, if you fall outside the acceptable range, things stop working.
“You’re not arrested. Instead, your loan is denied, your account is closed, your posts don’t reach anyone, your license comes under review. There’s no trial and no appeal because technically nothing happened — you just didn’t qualify.”
— escapekey.substack.com, “The One-Pager”
This is precisely the system the “globalists” have set up in China during the past three decades: a digital prison complete with central bank digital currencies, social credit scores, and information narrowly controlled by the dictators in the brutal PRC regime.
The elements of any control system set up by psychopaths are: a) extreme centralization that hands power to a very few, b) an anti-human agenda (often cloaked in flowery and/or obfuscating language), and c) secrecy. The psychopath fears transparency, for openness and honesty would reveal their hidden agendas. The basis for any modern control system, therefore, are lies, which are delivered via deliberately complex and confusing word salads.[1]
Psychopaths set up control systems because control systems flow naturally from their inherently antisocial personalities. It’s like water flowing downhill.
Corruption and fraud are the hallmarks of systems set up by psychopaths.
There is no logic to it other than gaining and maintaining personal power. Throughout history psychopaths have disrupted organizations and societies. It is done because it’s their nature to do so. Just as it is for the scorpion to kill the frog who carries him across the river, so that both perish.
It is almost impossible to explain this to a sane, reasonable person because sane people cannot understand it. Fortunately escapekey (and others) have written many articles describing the Global Governance system.
It isn’t necessarily evil, in my opinion. It is simply what psychopaths do.
Reasoning with psychopaths is difficult because they are truncated on the dynamics of life. They see ME, I, MINE and little else. Family, animals, the environment, the planet, the universe, none of it is that interesting to a psychopath, other than as a unit of something to monetize and control.
It is very instructive to read Robert D. Hare’s book on psychopathy, Without Conscience: The Disturbing World of the Psychopaths Among Us
How do people become psychopaths? I have no idea. But I do know that they are a very small portion of the population. A small group of nutters with undue influence over humanity.
It helps to be aware that psychopaths exist, and how to identify them. Reading Hare’s book is an eye-opener.
Final thoughts
1) Psychopaths exist and they disrupt human organizations and societies.
2) A Global Governance system is being designed and implemented by psychopaths, out of the public eye. Their goal is world domination and control.
3) Global Governance is being carried out completely independent of world events, in the background. To the GG crowd, for example, the capture of Venezuela’s leader Maduro is just politics and is irrelevant.
I see a few nations resisting the implementation of Global Governance, such as Russia and the US. (Curiously, the leaders of both countries are pilloried daily by the GG crowd, the world’s intelligence communities, and their captured corporate media.)
Governments in Europe, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand – all part of the Western Alliance – are embracing it. A few smaller eastern Euro states like Hungary are also resisting. (Curiously, Hungary’s leader Victor Orban is also pilloried in the international press.)
According to Elizabeth Nickson, in South and Central America, Global Governance is “being implemented region by region, city by city, avoiding national assemblies or parliaments.”
Unfortunately, China is already a goner, a fully established slave/surveillance state.
India, the world’s largest democracy, has recently implemented a biometric/demographic national ID card called Aadhaar for over 1 billion Indian citizens. As of May 2023, more than 99.9% of India’s adult population had been issued Aadhaar IDs. Aadhaar IDs control access to all government services, banking, and identification in India.
Here in the US, the push for a national biometric digital ID and a central bank digital currency (in which the Fed will own every cent you have) is strong because it’s a key step in broadly executing Global Governance at the national level. My hope is that Trump won’t align with his billionaire buddies and cave to the GG psychopaths.
How likely are these folks to succeed in their crazy plan?
Well, at the same time that the Global Governance system is being established worldwide, humanity is immersed in a planetary consciousness shift.
It’s Dark vs. Light, and the stakes are planet earth and the human race.
I don’t underestimate the positive effect of the consciousness shift on future events. It is a factor never included in predictions for the future, but I believe it is the most important variable. The Human Thought Space is changing rapidly as 8 billion human beings grow weary of the actions of psychopaths and demand positive change. Action follows thought.
Despite the vagaries of world events at any particular time, I see the outlines of a far more positive future taking shape on the horizon.
[1] Here is a typical example of the kind of meaningless gibberish found in many Global Governance documents. This is from the U.N.’s Agenda 2030, discussing a “multi-stakeholder forum on science, technology, and innovation”:
“The forum will provide a venue for facilitating interaction, matchmaking and the establishment of networks between relevant stakeholders and multi-stakeholder partnerships in order to identify and examine technology needs and gaps, including on scientific cooperation, innovation and capacity building, and also in order to help to facilitate development, transfer and dissemination of relevant technologies for the Sustainable Development Goals.”
This nonsense was either written by a very confused AI, or a recent graduate from one of our many dysfunctional universities.
Trump’s media company, Truth Social, operated by Trump Media & Technology Group (TMTG, ticker: DJT), a publicly traded company, just reached a deal with one of the two a-neutronic fusion companies in the world developing clean energy. A-neutronic means that the fusion reaction which produces electrical energy doesn’t generate harmful neutrons as a by-product. Neutrons are a source of harmful radiation. The Tri Alpha Energy fusion reactor uses magnetically contained fusion reactions that generate no harmful CO2 or pollutants.
A-neutronic fusion uses plasmas. A plasma is the fourth state of matter: solid, liquid, gas, plasma. Plasmas are composed of charged particles, ions and electrons. The sun is itself a fusion reactor.
Tri-Alpha Energy fusion reactor. Above: simplified prototype of the more complicated reactor below.
Advantages of fusion power over conventional power plants
An atom contains protons and neutrons in the nucleus, and electrons surrounding the nucleus. Electrons are negatively charged, protons are positively charged. When electrons are stripped from the atoms in a plasma, the atoms become positively charged ions and the electrons stay negatively charged. In a process called field-reverse-configuration, TAE causes a plasma to self-organize and generate its own magnetic field, which contains the fusion reaction that generates energy. When charged particles – positively charged ions and negatively charged electrons – move within a magnetic field, an electric field is created. Power can thus be drawn directly from the spinning plasma. This is much more efficient than a nuclear reactor, for example, which generates steam that turns a turbine. Steam power is 18th century technology.
The advantage of using fusion to generate electricity over conventional power generation is increased efficiency and elimination of the pollution factor.
Magnetically confined plasma is a far superior method than hot-fusion tokamaks, which have not been able to generate enough useful power without melting down the reactor shell. Moreover, power from plasma reactions avoids (a) the use of pipelines (that can be sabotaged) to deliver precious natural resources, (b) the exploitation of oil and natural gas deposits, and (c) depletion of mineral deposits necessary to make solar panels and wind turbines. All of the above are sources of war. Wherever there is a pipeline or a mineral deposit there’s a potential conflict.
Unlike a nuclear reactor, a fusion reactor can generate power efficiently and with little wasted heat. Oil, coal, and natural gas plants are less efficient and more polluting than a magnetically confined fusion power generator.
TAE uses plasmas to generate power. A plasma can be created in a laboratory. Of course natural resources must be used to build the reactors, but once the plant is built no fuel is required for power generation. Using plasmas, carbon emissions will be a thing of the past. Fusion reactor power plants will solve the man-made portion of the climate change problem.
Trump and TAE
Trump’s group partnership with TAE promotes clean, efficient fusion power and gives it a very significant spotlight. It’s a technological leap from the primitive energy generation plants of the past that deplete the earth’s natural resources.
My guess is that Trump haters will now be against clean fusion energy, for it removes the issues that are vital to their political platforms: climate change, pollution, and Green energy. “It’s just like Trump to let a private company spend their money and do all the hard work, then swoop in and reap the profits.” Maybe, but I don’t care how clean energy gets done, as long as it gets done. Our energy and chemical industries are polluting air, land, and water with PFAs and other toxic substances harmful to life.
Say what you want about Trump, he knows business and he doesn’t bet big money on long shots. To see for yourself, take a tour of the Tri Alpha Energy facility (thanks to Ashton Forbes for finding this vid):
The deal between TAE and TTMG is valued at more than $6 billion, structured as a merger of equals where shareholders of each company would own approximately 50% of the combined entity upon closing (expected mid-2026, pending approvals). This isn’t a cash acquisition where TMTG “pays” a specific amount to buy TAE outright. Instead, it’s an exchange of shares, with TMTG providing access to public markets and up to $300 million in funding support to TAE post-merger. The combined company would include Truth Social alongside TAE’s fusion energy operations, positioning it as one of the first publicly traded fusion companies. No cash payment for acquiring Tri Alpha Energy/TAE is reported at the time of this writing; the transaction is all-stock with no direct purchase price paid in cash. TAE remains private until the merger closes.
Anyone with an e-Trade account or a stock broker can invest in the new company, which trades on the ticker as DJT.
NOTE
As exciting as clean energy from nuclear fusion is, it is still not energy from the zero-point energy field. Nikola Tesla, over a hundred years ago, was working on tapping into this energy using high voltage, pulsed electrical currents at various resonance frequencies.
Even so, fusion power is a lot better than nuclear power, which generates steam to turn a rotor, and causes the massive pollution problem of spent nuclear fuel rods. It’s better than the inefficient windmills that are estimated to kill between 140,000 and 1.2 million birds annually in the United States every year, or inefficient (30% solar energy conversion) solar panels. Plasmas can be made self-organizing and self-sustaining, unlike energy from the sun, which doesn’t shine for half the day, or wind that blows intermittently. The TAE reactor reaches energy efficiencies (Beta values) over 90%.
Moreover, the vast majority of “Green” energy products – solar panels and the 80-foot-long blades of primitive windmills – are made by workers in the Peoples Republic of China. How does that benefit American workers? It doesn’t; but it’s great for the multibillionaires who sold out the United States and moved U.S. industries to China.
Trump is right about one thing: It’s OK for American companies to invest in projects that benefit American consumers and hire a few American workers.
I’m excited about the potential for clean energy from fusion power plants. It’s a step on the way toward fulfilling Tesla’s dream of a world with unlimited, clean energy for every human being on earth.
The word intractable means, something that stubbornly resists a solution. It comes from the Latin “intractabilis,” which combines “in-” meaning “not” and “tractabilis,” meaning “manageable” or “able to be handled.” It has been used in English since the late 15th century.
The most intractable problem of humanity is our inability to get along with each other.
In my opinion, the origin of all intractable human problems is human consciousness and how we define it. If you interviewed people on the street and said, “consciousness comes from the brain,” nine out of every ten people would probably agree.
Defining consciousness as materially based has caused the human race to be confused about who it is for millennia. History reflects this confusion in constant conflict.
Quantitative vs. qualitative
What consciousness is, has to do with the difference between qualitative and quantitative.
Quantitative has to do with things, and the measurement of those things. “How tall is that tree?” “How many gizmos does it take to make a widget?” “What is the necessary tensile strength of the materials used to build a bridge?” All of these things are quantities that can be measured. In engineering and science, there is often only one answer, or a range of values, that guarantee success.
Qualitative, on the other hand, has to do with the quality, or character, or essence of something. Qualitative refers to an attribute that is above and beyond the things of the physical universe.
Humanity has a millennia-long history of conflict and killing because it continues to describe human consciousness quantitatively.
Material things and systems are easily quantifiable. “That new material scored high on the stress test.” “The download speed on my internet connection is 320 megabits per second.” “Our company manufactured 100 widgets today.”
Consciousness is qualitative. We say, “That person is always cheerful.” “He is very intuitive.” “She is perceptive.” “Joe has integrity.” “Carla has a good character.”
A quality cannot easily be measured because it is an ephemeral attribute that describes an aspect of consciousness. A quality cannot be assigned a variable in a computer program, for example, for it is something that cannot be easily described. How do you define integrity, or character? Or cheerfulness? Or beauty?
These are qualities and their origin lies within consciousness itself.
Consciousness is, inherently, outside the purview of the physical universe. Consciousness is that which decides, or considers, or assigns value to the things in the physical universe.
There are many examples of characteristics that apply to consciousness and not to material things.
So why do scientists, doctors, psychologists, psychiatrists, and mass media define consciousness in material terms? Because that’s what they are taught. This misdefinition leads to terrible confusion for everyone about the most fundamental questions of life: “Who are you?” And, “What happens after you take your last breath?”
The answer to the latter question is frightening for those who believe in the quantitative definition of consciousness. The answer is, your awareness is snuffed out forever.
The new world technocracy
Amongst the “expert” classes there is fantastic and fanatical resistance to the very simple idea that a human being is a spiritual personality temporarily associated with a human body.
It is a grave error to describe something qualitative as quantifiable because it severely limits the human spirit and degrades human beings as a species. That leaves researchers in a bind because a good investigator needs data. But the only data that truly describes consciousness – qualitative data – is not definable or computable.
But that doesn’t stop the technocrats. The Global Governance system is now being implemented at international organizations like the UN, the WHO, the WEF, GAVI, the various public and private pharmaceutical networks, and many of the world’s governments – including our own – who see massive benefit in a quantitative system that can manage large populations.
In order to “manage” individuals, the technocrats cannot treat human beings as persons with inalienable rights. For these folks, a human being is just a ledger entry with values. Voters and elections, in this system, are obsolete. Human beings are quantified.
“The Global Governance matrix optimizes for stability, but humanity isn’t stable. We love people who are liabilities. We’re entertained by people who flirt with danger — real or imagined. We pursue meaning that has no monetary value. We insist on freedom that creates risk. From the matrix perspective, humanity is irrational — humanity is the prime problem to be solved.”
— escapekey.substack.com, “The Ghost of Wassily Leontief”
The world we live in today – a mess of conflict, hatred, and confusion – is the result of mis-identifying what consciousness is.
Because consciousness is inherently qualitative it cannot be accurately described by science, the scientific method, or by any technocratic process that is quantitative. The Global Governance system will ultimately be a massive failure, as long as there are enough human beings who understand their qualitative nature.
So what is consciousness then?
Even guys like Eckhart Tolle, Sadhguru, and Sri Nisargadatta Maharaj have a hard time describing what consciousness is, using language. Sri Nisargadatta Maharaj’s book, I am That, is a masterpiece and I have had many profound realizations from it. My edition has 464 pages. In it the Master answers essentially the same questions with essentially the same answers, using different and very clever examples. It is clear that Nisargadatta Maharaj found something, a profound understanding, that is intensely personal and that people could feel radiating off this humble shopkeeper. But even Nisargadatta Maharaj could not entirely explain what consciousness is to the satisfaction of his listeners.
This presents a conundrum: In order to advance, our species must recognize that the human spirit is quintessentially non-physical, a divine aspect of the Creative Source. When that occurs for enough persons, a tipping point will be reached.
All civilizations in this galaxy have faced that dilemma at some point in their development. Some make it, some don’t. We are at the crossroads now, today, at this moment.
Consciousness is ultimately non-physical. People aren’t their bodies. People aren’t meat. People aren’t quantifiable.
The consciousness shift
The failure to properly define consciousness, I believe, is not deliberate or evil. This idea is captured in the phrase, “Never assign to malice that which can adequately be explained by stupidity.”
Well, maybe not stupidity, but a lack of awareness. Fortunately that is changing.
I have asserted over and over in these essays that humanity is undergoing a massive consciousness shift. But what does that really mean?
It means that the collective awareness of humanity about itself is increasing. It means, as well, that individuals are discovering more about themselves, both good and bad. The good and the bad are being acted out on the Gameboard of Earth as humanity tries to find itself.
We are seeing on our screens a grand movie about human consciousness that is the culmination, or the denouement, of human activity and karma over the past 200,000 years. Since homo sapiens came out of the caves.
Does this movie have a happy ending?
I believe it does. To believe otherwise is to fall in with the Global Governance crowd and create a dystopian future.
Postscript
I am not religious, but I’ll leave you with this great quote from the Bible that I found in one of the MKULTRA memoirs I mentioned in my last post:
“For there is nothing covered up that will not be revealed; or hidden that shall not be known. Therefore whatsoever ye have spoken in darkness shall be heard in the light; and that which ye have whispered in private rooms shall be proclaimed upon the housetops.”
Human beings on planet earth are undergoing a massive consciousness shift. Human consciousness is, for want of a better word, expanding. That which has been hidden within the underbelly of human societies is being exposed to the light of truth.
The expansion of human awareness means that a person becomes more aware of everything, both good and evil.
Should we just ignore evil and concentrate on the good?
Unfortunately, doing good often means dealing with evil.
My sister-in-law runs the Traumatic Incident Reduction organization. This outfit trains counselors all over the world to eliminate or reduce traumatic incidents in people like firefighters, military members, and aid workers. During this process they discover a lot of horrible stuff.
We live in a duality, where good and evil are intimately connected.
The greatest of humanity’s evils is the abuse of children, and the bestial and murderous procedures and dark rituals that accompany it.
After watching the movie “Sound of Freedom,” about child trafficking and child abuse, I decided to look into it. I began finding the memoirs of people who had become, even as little babies, subjected to pedophilia and government-sponsored MKULTRA mind control. What I found shocked me and pissed me off. After living for over 70 years I thought I understood the world I lived in. I was wrong.
At first I didn’t believe that people could be so inhuman and monstrous. I told myself, “These accounts must be fantasies; confused memories of torture and abuse.” By the time I got to the fourth memoir I had to validate the information in them. They are all first-hand accounts.
Much of what we have been told about our political system in the US is not just a lie. The underlying truth is almost unbelievable.
Most people ignore the subject of child trafficking because it is so evil. “What’s the point? Nothing I can do about it.” Those who try to fight human trafficking say that it is a futile effort, for rescuing a few children here and there is a drop in the bucket compared to the millions who go missing every year. Child trafficking is embedded worldwide within governments. The State-sponsored (and private) trafficking networks are well established and insanely violent.
Our own government, from 2021 to 2024, assisted over 300,000 unaccompanied children over our southern border during the largest human trafficking operation in history. Some were sex trafficked, subjected to forced labor, or were abused. After you read these memoirs you will understand that these allegations are not conspiracy theories.
Sadly, child trafficking is just a subset of government sponsored Mind Control, and is conducted at the highest levels. State actors are behind it, as you will see if you read the references I have listed below.
What good can it do to read stories about people who become victims of abuse and mind control ops? I wasn’t sure when I started this project, but some inner urge told me to go ahead. I discovered, once I got over my initial shock, that this information opened my eyes and expanded my soul. It made me appreciate even more the goodness and resiliency of the average human being. I hope it will have a similar, positive effect for you.
Below are the memoirs of four unimaginably brave women who were MKULTRAed by the CIA. Mainstream sources (all you can get these days on an internet search) say that the program started in 1953 and ended in 1973. But 1973 was just the date that Richard Helms, the CIA Director at the time, had all of the MKULTRA files destroyed. I’m of the opinion that these programs continue to this day under other names, employing even more sophisticated “human technology.” The still-not-fully-released Epstein Files are a reminder of this.
We cannot fully embrace the Light until we have confronted the Dark Side of human nature.
Four memoirs
1. Trance-Formation of America, by Mark Phillips and Cathy O’Brien.
I have argued in these essays that the Collective Consciousness is the content of human thought in every moment. These thought forms reside – for want of a better term – within an envelope of subtle energy accessible to all persons. The content of the human thought space determines the Overton Window of acceptable actions in the physical universe. The thoughts in the Collective Consciousness change in every moment and so influence the thoughts of every other human being on the planet. In other words, we are all connected.
Thought always precedes action.
The value of “reality” is overrated. “Reality” is just the result of what has been thought and intended up to the present moment. Reality is malleable and changes when thought changes, and human beings act on those thoughts.
The origin of intractable problems like child trafficking always lies within human consciousness.
A famous science fiction writer once wrote, “The first step in handling anything is gaining the ability to face it.”
Reading this material will bring you face-to-face with the problem of child trafficking and child abuse. It will clarify your thinking about the subject. Because all human thought interacts together, such thought forms can have a powerful effect within the collective human consciousness.
There’s a personal benefit as well. I have found that confronting evil – after the shock wears off – creates a feeling of personal power.
Spiritually oriented persons who have thoroughly confronted an issue can have an enormous effect on human activity, as was proven by the meditations of thousands a few decades ago in reducing crime.
It is my hope that those who can get through these memoirs will become spiritual warriors.
By free speech I don’t mean physical acts of public confrontation or violence. I’m talking about writing and saying stuff online or in books.
Should “Free Speech” be Abolished?
“Free Speech” is an abused term in our current Narrative War. Those who cite free speech usually mean, “Speech I agree with.”
Those on the Left and Right use “abuses” of free speech in an attempt to censor others from speaking their minds.
On the Left we might hear things like, “Nick Fuentes should not be able to say that Hitler is ‘awesome’ and that immigrants and ‘organized Jewry’ are conspiring to extinguish the white race.” “Donald Trump should not be able to say that ‘We are going to kill people who run drugs into our country.’”
On the Right we hear, “That newly elected mayor of New York is a communist and should be removed from office.” “Jay Jones should not be able to write that “Republican politicians and their children should be shot.”
Yes they should. I am for completely unmitigated free speech because I want people to reveal their true selves. This helps me to track and categorize public figures.
I want to know what politicians and public figures really think. That will tell me what they will likely do when they actually get in office or in positions of influence.
The Narrative War created by social media has allowed people to express their true feelings. That’s a good thing.
As a result, the country is dividing itself into what I call Collectivists and Populists.
Collectivists are mainly liberals who are tired of the conflict and anger and hatred. These people want peace. The only way to get peace is to have agreement within society on what is and what is not acceptable speech. Collectivists agree that in order to avoid conflict, everyone should in general agree with each other.
But getting human beings born with free will to agree with each other is impossible. This is frustrating for Collectivists because they believe Populists are out of control and always speak their minds regardless how often they piss people off. This causes conflict in society, they argue, and it’s totally unnecessary.
Populists are people who believe in the freedom to do what they want without government interference. Donald J. Trump is the hero of many Populists precisely because he says whatever he wants. He is the prime perpetrator of free speech abuse, the Left argues. People on the Right admit cheerfully that Trump unmercifully trolls the press and left-liberals. (This is the source of Trump Derangement Syndrome, recognized by the APA’s Psychology Today.) Populists relentlessly meme the Left in mocking and insulting terms.
People like Trump encourage unlimited free speech that the Left considers to be the source of social conflict. The only option (they say) is rigid enforcement of ideas and conversation to a common standard. They call objectionable free speech “misinformation,” or “disinformation.”
Uh, no. It’s people identifying for everyone who they really are.
The Left gets frustrated because the First Amendment essentially bars censorship of free speech, which is why some lefties have called for its abolishment. It’s why lefties say they (the Democrats) are going to pack the Supreme Court when they win back the Senate. I applaud the person who said the quiet part out loud. That’s the power of free speech. It that in 2026 I can’t vote for a Democrat.
Conservatives have the same issue, particularly religious types, who want schools to teach the Bible, and ban Drag Queens and “gender identity.”
As far as free speech is concerned, the Hard Right is like the Hard Left, just with different agendas.
Free speech is a problem for both sides of the political debate. A problem is two opposing forces equally balancing each other. Neither side of the Problem is strong enough to overcome the other, so the problem persists. This causes immense frustration and anger for those with agendas who want to resolve problems their way.
And so the solution of choice on both sides is more censorship of ideas and speech.
The Common Denominator of Tyranny
Throughout history, tyranny has been exercised equally by Left and Right. Fascist dictators like Mussolini, Hitler, Franco in Spain, and military dictators in South America, Africa, and Asia are on the Right. Communist dictators like Stalin, Mao, and Pol Pot are on the Left. Both are totalitarian.
The true distinction in political philosophies is between tyranny and freedom.
One might conclude that the inevitable result of free speech is tyranny. But when we look a little deeper we see that the common denominator of tyranny is not free speech, but intolerance of other viewpoints.
What did C. S. Lewis say about this? “Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive.”
I would argue that almost all forms of tyranny are motivated by good intentions! “Good intentions” is used by both Left and Right to suppress free speech in pursuit of “good” agendas.
Free Speech is not Tyranny
The intolerance of the viewpoints of others automatically leads to conflict. Let’s not mis-assign this to free speech, which is a freedom.
It is the suppression of free speech that eventually leads to a dead, totalitarian society. Throughout history, when the animating spirit moves through and within a society or a movement, it expands and is inclusive and accepting of new ideas. Free speech is a necessary condition for a prosperous, vibrant society.
It would be nice if the consciousness of humanity was high enough so that everyone could tolerate the opinions of others. That would lead to a mental and emotional relaxation in the whole of society, for individuals would understand that expressing themselves was perfectly acceptable. Lest you object, it would also largely eliminate the violence of desperation. It would eliminate the urge to push the boundaries of acceptable behavior, and assert the validity of insanities such as, “men can have babies.”
It would also eliminate the blockage on creatives, who would be free to express themselves more freely.
Guess what? This is exactly what is occurring in society today!
People are expressing themselves in the most bizarre ways because the blocks to free speech and action are dissolving.
This leads conservatives to bemoan the crazy state of affairs, and liberals to bemoan the violence they consider to be inevitable when free speech is not limited.
Is the social upheaval we are experiencing anarchy, or a social cleansing?
Personally, I see a positive future result. Humanity’s volatile nature means that when human consciousness begins to rise, the dark underbelly of the human condition gets exposed. And it’s appalling. When the light shines brighter and brighter, it uncovers the darkness. It appears that a lot of violence and hatred has to be blown off before the system evolves to a higher state. This is sad, but apparently it is necessary for humanity’s evolution to a higher state of human tolerance and consciousness.
Censoring speech merely delays the process of enlightenment. All issues facing humanity must be identified and debated worldwide. In my opinion, that is the true function of social media.
The Prigogene Effect
From the Big Picture view, we are in a chaotic period where society deals with the evil and the karma it has created over the past 6,000 years. All of that karma, I believe, is lodged within the collective consciousness of humanity (what I have called, in previous posts, the Human Thought Space).
In 1977, Ilya Prigogene received the Nobel Prize in chemistry for discovering that systems which are far from equilibrium (far from balance) begin to self-organize. Prigogene showed how order can emerge from chaos in open systems, challenging the traditional view of the second law of thermodynamics that predicts chaos always leads to increasing disorder.
If Prigogene is correct, the current social chaos will eventually evolve to a stable social state. We are going to discover which political system wins out.
Absurdities and Free Speech
Having said all this, I do acknowledge that unlimited free speech leads to absurdities. Below I present an article by William M. Briggs, a mathematician and statistician. This article is a perfect example of what results when people express themselves without self-censorship. It would probably be considered objectionable by half the country. But one thing is certain: After reading this article you will know where William M. Briggs stands on social issues. Society, in my opinion, needs people like Briggs, Trump, and Jay Jones. People who express themselves fearlessly and let us know where they stand.
Cross Post
This link should work for you to see the original article on Substack.
Academics Debate Which Term Best Describes Those Who Love (in that way) Their Pillows
WILLIAM M BRIGGS (wmbriggs.substack.com)
NOV 10, 2025
Years ago we reported on a woman (fat, ugly) who wanted to “marry” “Sky Scream, a rollercoaster at Holiday Park in Hassloch, Germany.” She was in love with it, says one source. Well, women being fickle, you won’t be surprised to learn she dumped the rollercoaster and moved in, or rather with, “a large purple ride called Gravity in Foire aux Plaisirs, in Bordeaux, France”.
Pleasurable Gravity might be a good translation. And is sensible, given it appears the woman gained a lot of weight over the years. She claims to have conceived a baby with the ride. This may be how Tilt-a-Whirls come into the world.Upgrade to paid
If there can be pregnant men, we ought not to scoff at women who claim fairground rides impregnate them.
Insanity is a constant in man, and this report would be of no large interest, except that it has captured the attention of academics. As the source above says: “Gaëlle is an objectophile – a person attracted to inanimate objects.”
I have tried to explain many times that once we allowed the idea of “sexual orientations”, once you allow even the seemingly harmless distinction of “homosexual” and “heterosexual”, then any and all desires would eventually, and must, be labeled an “orientation”, and so come under the beady eyes of supportive researchers.
A cardinal sin in academia is offending crazy people. This explains the peer-reviewed article “Objectum Sexuality or Objectophilia” (pdf) in the International Journal of Advanced Studies in Sexology, arguing about which name best describes sexual attraction to fairground rides. Advanced studies alert!
It is worth quoting the Abstract:
“Loving Objects” a category of peoples that explores the formation of a newly named sexual orientation, also called objectum-sexuality (OS), are the one who openly declare their desire for objects, loving the objects not like a fetishism, like an amorous partner, even life partners. The fallow material examines some aspects regarding OS behaviour, how they interact in the online environment with the rest of the world, how they perceive sexual intimacy and what rights they demand, the fact that it represents a non-specific paraphilia and that it has links with autism and synaesthesia.
Ah, “rights”. Which logically imply duties. In this case, your duty, dear reader, to be an ally: “Lack of social acceptance for Objectum Sexuality relationships (marriage with objects) is the main problem”. Correct your non-acceptance, Anon.
If you don’t want to learn about “special pillows”, then do not click the link. The author also accuses Quasimodo of having the hots for the bells of Notre Dame. And why not? People who love fairground rides and church bells are in relationships that “are no less and no more of value than other romantic relationships.”
Like I said, academics want in on every new “orientation”, and admit it, as in this passage from an introduction on the subject in the book Silent Partners in Multicultural Education (page xii):
Yet an increasing number of researchers call for inanimates to be taken into account in research, moving away from anthropocentrism (where the human is at the center) and leading to “an object turn.”…Object-Oriented Ontology (OOO, or Triple O) gives objects their due.
At least it’s easy to see how they’ll fit “Triple O” on the sexual deviancy flag.
Here I must ask you to stomach a passage which I believe explains the true mind of a modern academic:
While objectophilia has clearly emerged in other fields of research, education, especially multicultural education, appears to be a bit reluctant to open up its doors to objects. Barad (2007) and Osberg & Biesta (2010) are exceptions in general education research. Karen Barad (2007), philosopher of science, applies her concept of agential realism to explain the complex web of interrelations and intra-activities among human and nonhuman beings in knowing and learning. Osberg and Biesta (2010) rely on centrifugal logic, or rhizomatic logic, according to Deleuze and Guattari (1987), of knowledge-forming processes that take place between humans and nonhuman material artifacts.
Once you have let yourself fall into the clutches of rhizomatic logic you are lost. Even letting yourself write in earnest “knowledge-forming processes” is the death of hope. Only a miracle will save you.
This thesis explores the intersections between queer theory and object-oriented ontologies (OOOs) through examining three case studies of objects in human drag: (1) hats, purses and shoes; (2) mannequins; and (3) dildos. I argue that queer theory and OOOs are necessarily connected in that both offer philosophical strategies of resistance to hegemonic structures imposed by binary gender categories, compulsory heterosexuality and compulsory anthropocentrism.
If you will not defund, at least consider nuking universities from space.
For the past year or so I have been engaged in a personal battle within myself. I’m almost 74 now, and I have been getting the feeling that I’ve done everything I came into this world to do, and that I better start preparing to depart this mortal coil.
This is not a good feeling. It’s accompanied by the emotions of hopelessness and helplessness. It hasn’t dominated my life but it’s uncomfortable.
My life is pretty good, actually. I have nothing to complain about. So where are these emotions coming from?
Some people would simply dismiss them and take a pharmaceutical drug to dull the senses. I almost did that. After months of this with no resolution I was about ready to ask my doctor for a prescription. Gimme a pill, doc!
Then something remarkable happened.
I always meditate while in bed. This happens sometimes just after I turn out the light. I meditate more often in the middle of the night after I wake up around 4a.m. I most often meditate a half-hour or so in the morning before I get out of bed.
Two nights ago I got a past-life memory; I don’t know what else to call it. It was accompanied by very strong emotions, and hazy visuals as well.
I was a member of an indigenous band of hunter-gatherers. In my group, when a person became too old to hunt or gather or fight, the custom was to take yourself away from the community. This was necessary because the group could not afford to feed an extra mouth. By necessity, a person who could no longer contribute to the survival of the group voluntarily went into the wilderness to die. It was either that or be forcibly exiled.
During this glimpse into my past (??) I understood immediately that this situation was the source of my feelings of hopelessness and helplessness. I was a single woman, and knew I wouldn’t last long on my own.
It’s difficult for me to emphasize how freeing this little dream was. It just slid into my consciousness, completely unrelated to my life, and blew those crummy emotions away. And it explained everything about my present situation.
It was way too real to be fake. Sometimes I see a movie or a program, and it is like a seed that gets me dreaming along those lines. But this incident was completely removed from my life. It was like a gift from God.
It’s so easy in our materialist society to consciously dismiss “spiritual experiences” like this, but I could not dismiss the fact that the feelings that had been bothering me for almost a year were gone.
So yeah, I’m gonna take it!
Then, last night, I had another dream that confirmed the previous one, but this one was more positive.
Sometimes my dreams are so lucid they are realer than real life. This dream was one of those, even though it had no basis in “reality.”
I was walking along one of the academic neighborhoods in Ann Arbor. In one particular area the houses have no sidewalks and they are sort of squashed together in their own area. I went up a walkway and got tangled up where little paths led to, around, and into the properties of each other. I found myself going into the house of a famous professor of literature and was looking for a way out when the professor discovered me in his kitchen, looking for the front door. This is where it gets amazing, as dreams sometimes do.
I was embarrassed but apologized for entering his house. He smiled at me and said, “Well, you know, I’m the Holy Grail.”
Sounds nonsensical, but in the dream the professor was famous for his literary investigations into Camelot and the Knights of the Round Table, so it made sense. He did shows on the local university channel that became very popular.
The professor approached me and twinkled at me, his eyes lighting up as if he had discovered a soul brother. Something I didn’t know was in me twinkled back. There was a feeling of lightness and a childlike innocence between us.
“I’m so glad I met you professor!” I said happily, and he grinned widely.
Something inside me had changed for the better, I could feel it. I have been getting more and more serious lately, and I felt I had re-connected with something I had lost.
“I’ll exit from the front door,” I said.
He twinkled at me again and I walked down the front walkway that thankfully led to the street.
As I did that something amazing happened. I suddenly felt a rush of positive energy and my body felt as light as a feather, as if I was a kid again. Then the word “fairies” sounded in my consciousness and a little guy with a magic wand appeared in front of me. He waved his wand and sparkles of light surrounded me and I felt better than I have felt for a long time.
“Are you a fairy?” I asked.
He twinkled at me just as the professor had done, and disappeared. I felt myself getting more and more energized. I begin to run effortlessly down the street and then the dream ended.
These dreams convinced me again that a spiritual system exists on this planet that is designed to help anyone who is looking for answers from the higher plane, and who is open to spiritual experiences.
What’s bullshit isn’t spirituality or a person’s inherent connection to a higher realm of existence, but the horseshit we are fed day after day by grifters, psychopaths, political liars, narrative spinners, and “experts” who promote endless war, conflict, and the idea that a human being is nothing but a stimulus-response biological robot.
When I got up this morning, as usual, I checked out the news. But instead of getting angry at people who bring others down, I just gave them a little twinkle and spread some of that magic fairy dust toward them. It’s hard for me because I get so pissed-off at self-centered bullies who promote and grift off of human problems.
But I don’t feel like preparing to depart anymore.
Maybe it was a miracle. We’ll see how long it lasts.
