The social justice movement is (depending on which \u201cside\u201d\nyou are on) either a way to reduce the gross disparities in income between rich\nand poor (along with a host of other social inequalities) or a Neo-Marxist\nattempt to destroy Western Civilization. The truth is somewhere between.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
In 1949 George Orwell wrote his famous book 1984, <\/em>in which he postulated what the\nworld would look like 35 years later. Orwell saw the rise of fascism, Naziism,\nand intolerance, and speculated that if present trends continued from 1949, the\nworld would eventually turn into a vast surveillance\/police state, which he nicknamed \u201cBig Brother.\u201d <\/p>\n\n\n\n The world HAS turned into a surveillance state, led by big\ntech giants Google, Facebook, Twitter, Apple, etc., who monitor our\ncommunications 24 hours a day. I just saw an Apple commercial for a new \u201cfeature\u201d\n\u2013 retinal scanning \u2013 which would allow your retinal patterns to be transferred\nto a database somewhere. That database is likely sitting somewhere in an\nintelligence agency. We already know that apps like WeChat (which is being used\nby President-for-life Xi Jinping to create a police\/surveillance state in China)\nand Facebook, and mobile technology, monitor us all the time. Facebook was\nfounded on the same day, in February 2004, that DARPA\u2019s Project Lifelog was\nterminated (look this up). Big Tech is essentially a tool of the intelligence\ncommunity. Google\u2019s goal is to collect information on everything and everyone everywhere\nin the world, and they are doing a good job of that! <\/p>\n\n\n\n So part of Orwell\u2019s nightmare is already happening. But this\nis the last gasp of the dark army. It will eventually fail. It was begun in the\nold energy, before December 2012, and must play out in the new timeline. The\npoint is that lightworkers need not be afraid of something that must run its\ncourse.<\/p>\n\n\n\n It is instructive to examine the tools used by those with dark\nagendas. The battle on earth at present is not one between good and evil, it is one between light and\ndark. But the battle is being framed<\/em>\nas one between good and evil (see my post \u201cGood vs. Evil \u2013 Light vs. Dark\u201d on\nthis blog). The \u201cgood vs. evil\u201d debate is guaranteed to spawn hatred and\ncontention. That\u2019s the goal of the dark army.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The social justice movement (regardless of its origins,\nwhich was probably from the generosity of classic liberalism) has unfortunately\nmorphed into a contentious philosophy that pits victims versus oppressors.\nVictims are now entire classes of people: women, African Americans, Hispanics,\nLGBTQ+ \u2013 anyone who is considered a \u201cminority.\u201d Oppressors are usually old\nwhite guys like me, or entire philosophies like capitalism. The social justice\nmovement now sees capitalism, and even Western civilization itself (which after\nall was largely built by white guys) as inherently racist and oppressive. <\/p>\n\n\n\n There is little room for discernment, or intelligence, or\nreasonableness here. It is a worldview based entirely on materialism, which is\nthe hallmark of the dark army. The value of persons no longer depend on their qualities or\nabilities, but on their bodies, their skin color, their sex. Those who do not\nconform have committed what Orwell called thoughtcrime. A thought crime,\naccording to the Oxford Dictionary site, is <\/p>\n\n\n\n a word used in the novel to describe the act of thinking socially unacceptable thoughts or holding opinions that are ideologically distinct from The Party\u2019s…. Thought police, the term for the group in Nineteen Eighty-Four that monitored the populace for any signs of unorthodox thought or action, has also become popular to signify any organization that attempts to suppress freedom of thought.<\/p> Intelligence is the ability to discern differences between\nthings. The social justice movement in its present form negates the necessity\nfor original thought, objective observation, and discernment. Oppressor classes\nare automatically racist (or inherently have other pejorative qualities); victim\nclasses are inherently non-racist and socially acceptable. In Orwell\u2019s book, The Party used the language\nof doublespeak and newspeak to gradually dumb down populations, so that citizens\ncould be easily manipulated and controlled. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Here is what the Oxford Dictionary site has to say:<\/p>\n\n\n\n Newspeak intended not only to force the populace to conform their thoughts and ideologies towards those of The Party, but to make it impossible to even conceive of any other point of view. For example, one character in the novel mentions that one of The Party\u2019s most chiefly known slogans, \u201cFreedom is Slavery,\u201d will eventually change; for when Newspeak has reached its goals, the very idea of Freedom as defined in this fashion would be impossible for the populace even to imagine. Other Newspeak words illustrate such attempts to control thought and even the populace\u2019s ideas about reality itself: doublethink, for example, means to hold two contradictory beliefs to be true, but without any cognitive dissonance, allowing one to be unaware of actual contradictions. The slogans of The Party, \u201cWar is Peace,\u201d \u201cFreedom is Slavery,\u201d and \u201cIgnorance is Strength,\u201d are perfect examples of this phenomenon. Doublethink as a concept is what allows the totalitarian party to thrive without collapsing in on itself: for example, members of The Party can commit acts they know to be immoral while accepting the idea that no act they commit could possibly be immoral.<\/p>Ibid.<\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n Does this sound familiar? Examples of doublethink and newspeak are abundant in today\u2019s political landscape. On both \u201csides.\u201d Here\u2019s one example: https:\/\/pjmedia.com\/trending\/ideological-enforcement-twitter-blocks-heritage-foundation-director-over-trans-sports-tweet\/<\/a>\u00a0 Personally, I couldn\u2019t care less about the Heritage Foundation or their opinions. But the article illustrates some of these Orwellian concepts that are taking hold in society.<\/p>\n\n\n\n In Orwell\u2019s 1984<\/em>, discernment\nby the population was frowned upon, for intelligent people see the difference\nbetween freedom and tyranny. Dictators don\u2019t like this! In the US today, the\nfake \u201cgood vs. evil\u201d debate perpetuates Orwell\u2019s degenerative Newspeak ideas. People\nare automatically racist or evil depending on their body type, or what they\nbelieve, if it contradicts the prevailing ideas as promoted in mass media. It\u2019s\na great way to negate the principle of free speech, and religious principles\nsuch as freedom of belief. This, again, is the work of the dark army. Dictators\nand totalitarian governments throughout history have suppressed and banned free\nspeech and freedom of belief and religion. It is happening all over the world\ntoday. <\/p>\n\n\n\n But there is a solution to this madness for individuals, as\nI pointed out in the last post. Good and evil are entirely subjective and will\nlead to pointless, never-ending arguments and conflict. But light and dark\ntranscend \u201csides.\u201d It is easy to see whether a person is exercising tolerance,\ncompassion, and love. It is easy to see whether a person demonstrates hatred\nand intolerance. People are not inherently anything (except children of God) \u2013 because every human being has free will.\nTherefore, each individual can change his or her mind at any time. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Having your entire life and person pigeonholed into a\nsimplistic category such as \u201cracist\u201d because you believe a certain way, or you\nhave a certain sex or body type, is hurtful. But it is understandable, which I\nwill explain in a second. Being categorized as a \u201cvictim\u201d is also hurtful to\nthose with ability and higher consciousness, so it works both ways.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Such narrow-minded accusations suit those who hate \u2013 but\nremember that the primary quality of those in darkness is ignorance and a lack\nof discernment. Let\u2019s take the viewpoint of the light here! One might say that\nthose who hate aren\u2019t evil at all, but are merely operating on a lack of\ninformation that results from lower consciousness. They have little discernment and can\u2019t see\npast simplistic white and black categories. Nuance, which comes from\ndiscernment and higher consciousness, is lacking. Therefore, responding with\nhate to hate will only exacerbate the situation for you and for them. Behind\nthe newspeak and the thoughtcrime and the doublespeak and the accusations and\nthe intolerance is stark, raving, fear. People who do this are genuinely\ntroubled. <\/p>\n\n\n\n The job of the lightworker is to spread light, but it gets\nhard sometimes. However, if you can make the distinction between the false\ngood-evil paradigm and the light-dark paradigm, life gets a little easier.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" The social justice movement is (depending on which \u201cside\u201d you are on) either a way to reduce the gross disparities in income between rich and poor (along with a host of other social inequalities) or a Neo-Marxist attempt to destroy … Continue reading
Source: Oxford Dictionaries, \u201cA look at Orwell\u2019s Newspeak,\u201d https:\/\/blog.oxforddictionaries.com\/2014\/09\/30\/george-orwell-newspeak\/ <\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n